Literature DB >> 3774562

Anthropometric indicators of breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women in Hawaii.

L N Kolonel, A M Nomura, J Lee, T Hirohata.   

Abstract

As part of a case-control study of breast cancer in Hawaii, self-reported data on height, weight at various ages, breast size, shoe size, and triceps skinfold thickness were collected from 138 Japanese postmenopausal cases, 134 Caucasian postmenopausal cases, 154 Japanese neighborhood controls, and 142 Caucasian neighborhood controls. In a multiple covariance analysis, cases of both ethnic groups were slightly heavier (at all ages) and more obese (based on a weight-corrected-for-height index) than were controls, although none of the differences was statistically significant. Among the Japanese only, cases were also taller, had a greater body surface area (computed from the height and weight data), and had a larger shoe size than did the controls. The latter finding was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Odds ratios were computed by multiple logistic regression analysis and revealed no additional relationships; however, there were suggested dose-response gradients for height, weight at age 20, and body surface area in the Japanese women and for breast size in the Caucasian women. A further analysis of risks based on changes in relative body weight between young adult life (age 20) and current age was also negative. Overall, these findings offer only weak support for an association between weight or obesity and breast cancer risk and suggest that anthropometric indices are at best very indirect indicators of true etiologic factors for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3774562     DOI: 10.1080/01635588609513901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  9 in total

1.  Anthropometric measures and metabolic rate in association with risk of breast cancer (United States).

Authors:  S C Freni; M S Eberhardt; A Turturro; R J Hine
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Laterality of breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  H A Weiss; S S Devesa; L A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Prenatal DES exposure in relation to breast size.

Authors:  Julie R Palmer; Deborah A Boggs; Elizabeth E Hatch; Rebecca Troisi; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; William C Strohsnitter; Ervin Adam; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Is breast size a predictor of breast cancer risk or the laterality of the tumor?

Authors:  R T Senie; A F Saftlas; L A Brinton; R N Hoover
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  The effect of dietary fat on breast cancer survival among Caucasian and japanese women in Hawaii.

Authors:  A M Nomura; L L Marchand; L N Kolonel; J H Hankin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A prospective study of reproductive, familial and socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer using NHANES I data.

Authors:  C L Carter; D Y Jones; A Schatzkin; L A Brinton
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Breast size and prognosis in early breast cancer.

Authors:  A L Hoe; M A Mullee; G T Royle; P B Guyer; I Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Non-randomness of the anatomical distribution of tumors.

Authors:  Clare Yu; James Kameron Mitchell
Journal:  Cancer Converg       Date:  2017-12-19

9.  Anthropometric indicators of breast cancer risk in Japanese women in Fukuoka.

Authors:  S Kyogoku; T Hirohata; S Takeshita; Y Hirota; T Shigematsu
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.