Literature DB >> 8317960

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A preliminary experience.

D J Winchester1, L G Dawes, D D Modelski, D L Nahrwold, R A Pomerantz, J B Prystowsky, R V Rege, R J Joehl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized trial.
SETTING: Veterans Affairs hospital and a large university hospital. PATIENTS: The study included 38 patients (36 male and two female) who had an acceptable risk for general anesthesia, presented electively, and gave informed consent; patients were excluded for whom general anesthesia had a high risk or who had incarcerated or strangulated hernias. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was performed with general anesthesia through bilateral, lower-abdominal, 12-mm lateral rectus sheath ports with an umbilical 30 degrees viewing laparoscope. After the peritoneum was incised and flaps were raised, an onlay patch of polypropylene mesh, secured with staples, covered both indirect and direct hernia regions in each patient. Small hernia sacs were usually reduced or excised.
RESULTS: From December 1991 through October 1992, 40 inguinal hernias were repaired; two patients had bilateral hernias. There were 22 indirect and 17 direct inguinal hernias and one femoral hernia. Nine of the hernias repaired were recurrent, and five were sliding hernias. Complications occurred in nine patients, but there were no recurrences during a median follow-up of 26 weeks. All but one patient resumed preoperative activities by 7 days after the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is an effective operation with low morbidity. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the durability of the repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8317960     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420190077010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  7 in total

Review 1.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Alternative methods of exposure minimize cardiopulmonary risk in experimental animals during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  B S Davidson; D M Cromeens; B W Feig
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Initiation of a pediatric robotic surgery program: institutional challenges and realistic outcomes.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael H Johnson; Catherine Delostrinos; Jeff B Bice; Richard W Grady; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results.

Authors:  K Lawrence; D McWhinnie; A Goodwin; H Doll; A Gordon; A Gray; J Britton; J Collin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-14

5.  A comparison of patient recovery following unilateral and bilateral endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  S A Ahmad; A L Schuricht
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  The role of laparoscopy in the management of groin hernia.

Authors:  S Ahmad; L Lettsome; A Schuricht
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Virgin and recurrent groin hernia: a comparison of patient recovery following endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  S A Ahmad; A L Schuricht
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.