Literature DB >> 7580639

Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results.

K Lawrence1, D McWhinnie, A Goodwin, H Doll, A Gordon, A Gray, J Britton, J Collin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the safety, short term outcome, and theatre costs of transabdominal laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia performed as day surgery.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. The control operation was the two layer modified Maloney darn.
SETTING: Teaching hospital and district general hospital.
SUBJECTS: 125 men randomised to laparoscopic or open repair of inguinal hernia. OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, postoperative pain and use of analgesics, quality of life, and theatre costs. Outcome was assessed by questionnaires administered to patients daily for 10 days and at six weeks postoperatively and by outpatient review at six weeks. Return to normal activity was assessed by questionnaire at three months.
RESULTS: One vascular complication (2%) occurred in the group that had open repair. Seven complications (12%) including vessel injury and early recurrence arose in the group that had laparoscopic repair (difference in complication rate 10% (95% confidence interval 4% to 18%; P = 0.02). Pain scores and quality of life assessed by the short form 36 showed a significant benefit to the group that had laparoscopic repair in the early postoperative period. Return to normal activity was not significantly different between the two groups. Total theatre costs were higher in the group that had laparoscopic repair (mean cost for laparoscopic repair 850 pounds (622 pounds to 1078 pounds); mean cost for open repair 268 pounds (245 pounds to 292 pounds)).
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the greater complication rate and higher theatre costs for laparoscopic repair and the patient outcome preferences expressed, the results of larger trials of clinical and cost effectiveness using recurrence as the primary outcome measure should be known before laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is widely adopted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7580639      PMCID: PMC2550988          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7011.981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Are current techniques of inguinal hernia repair optimal? A survey in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  M Morgan; A Reynolds; A V Swan; R Beech; H B Devlin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  The safety of mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias: results of 3,019 operations from five diverse surgical sources.

Authors:  A G Shulman; P K Amid; I L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials.

Authors:  D Schwartz; J Lellouch
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1967-08

5.  Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Lau; E M Antman; J Jimenez-Silva; B Kupelnick; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A preliminary experience.

Authors:  D J Winchester; L G Dawes; D D Modelski; D L Nahrwold; R A Pomerantz; J B Prystowsky; R V Rege; R J Joehl
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-07

7.  Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  D L Stoker; D J Spiegelhalter; R Singh; J M Wellwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Repair of inguinal hernia in the adult with Prolene mesh.

Authors:  J A Capozzi; J A Berkenfield; J K Cherry
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988-08

9.  Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; J N Baxter; S Ross; J R Anderson; C G Morran; G Sunderland; D Galloway; G Ramsay; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Laparoscopic hernia repair.

Authors:  M S Kavic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  37 in total

1.  Conventional or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? The surgeon's choice.

Authors:  N Williams; A Scott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  The use of QALY and non-QALY measures of health-related quality of life. Assessing the state of the art.

Authors:  M Deverill; J Brazier; C Green; A Booth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  S Byford; S Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate.

Authors:  V Puri; E Felix; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Guidelines for inguinal hernia repair in everyday practice.

Authors:  J Metzger; N Lutz; I Laidlaw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group.

Authors:  Fritz H Berndsen; U Petersson; D Arvidsson; C-E Leijonmarck; C Rudberg; S Smedberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Health-related quality of life after TAPP repair for the sportsmen's groin.

Authors:  Gerwin A Bernhardt; Gerald Gruber; Benjamin S Molderings; Herwig Cerwenka; Mathias Glehr; Christian Giessauf; Peter Kornprat; Andreas Leithner; Hans-Jörg Mischinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study).

Authors:  B Johansson; B Hallerbäck; H Glise; B Anesten; S Smedberg; J Román
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  Jordi Alonso; Montserrat Ferrer; Barbara Gandek; John E Ware; Neil K Aaronson; Paola Mosconi; Niels K Rasmussen; Monika Bullinger; Shunichi Fukuhara; Stein Kaasa; Alain Leplège
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications.

Authors:  Ashley D Willoughby; Robert B Lim; Michael B Lustik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.