Literature DB >> 8315606

Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog.

W Wilczynski1, B E McClelland, A S Rand.   

Abstract

Advertisement calls, auditory tuning, and larynx and ear morphology were examined in 3 neotropical frogs, Hyla microcephala, H. phlebodes and H. ebraccata, H. microcephala has the highest call dominant frequency (6.068 kHz) and basilar papilla tuning (5.36 kHz). H. phlebodes and H. ebraccata calls have lower dominant frequencies (3.832 and 3.197 kHz respectively) and basilar papilla tuning (2.79 and 2.56 kHz). The primary call notes of H. ebraccata are longer (181.6 ms) than those of H. microcephala (95.5 ms) or H. phlebodes (87.3 ms). Morphometric analysis suggests that temporal call features differ as laryngeal musculature changes, in the process changing the overall size of the larynx. The spectral aspects of the call differ as head size, and hence the size of its resonating and radiating structures, changes, modifying the dominant frequency of calls by accentuating their higher harmonics when head size decreases. Decreasing head size decreases the size of the middle and inner ear chambers, changing the mechanical tuning of the ear in the same direction as the change in dominant frequency. These changes result in divergent spectral-temporal characteristics of both the sending and receiving portions of the acoustic communication system underlying social behavior in these frogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315606     DOI: 10.1007/bf00213524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  12 in total

1.  The effects of body size on functional properties of middle ear systems of anuran amphibians.

Authors:  T E Hetherington
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. I. Differences among populations and between sexes.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; A C Keddy-Hector; M J Ryan
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 3.  Neural basis of sound pattern recognition in anurans.

Authors:  A S Feng; J C Hall; D M Gooler
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; C Resler; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Action of intrinsic laryngeal muscles during release calling in leopard frog.

Authors:  R S Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1972-08

6.  Jamming avoidance in electric fish and frogs: strategies of signal oscillator timing.

Authors:  R Zelick
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  Sexually dimorphic laryngeal morphology in Rana pipiens.

Authors:  B E McClelland; W Wilczynski
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.804

Review 8.  The auditory system of anuran amphibians.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; R R Capranica
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Species specificity and temperature dependency of temporal processing by the auditory midbrain of two species of treefrogs.

Authors:  G J Rose; E A Brenowitz; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Evidence for parallel processing in the frog's auditory thalamus.

Authors:  J C Hall; A S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  10 in total

1.  Seasonal plasticity of peripheral auditory frequency sensitivity.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to airborne sounds in the aquatic frog Xenopus laevis: correlation with middle ear characteristics.

Authors:  Bharti Katbamna; John A Brown; Melissa Collard; Charles F Ide
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response.

Authors:  Jason A Miranda; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea.

Authors:  Jason A Miranda; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  A reversal in sensory processing accompanies ongoing ecological divergence and speciation in Rhagoletis pomonella.

Authors:  Cheyenne Tait; Hinal Kharva; Marco Schubert; Daniel Kritsch; Andy Sombke; Jürgen Rybak; Jeffrey L Feder; Shannon B Olsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Multimodal signaling in the Small Torrent Frog (Micrixalus saxicola) in a complex acoustic environment.

Authors:  Doris Preininger; Markus Boeckle; Anita Freudmann; Iris Starnberger; Marc Sztatecsny; Walter Hödl
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Decoupled Evolution between Senders and Receivers in the Neotropical Allobates femoralis Frog Complex.

Authors:  Mileidy Betancourth-Cundar; Albertina P Lima; Walter Hӧdl; Adolfo Amézquita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Geographic variation in the matching between call characteristics and tympanic sensitivity in the Weeping lizard.

Authors:  Antonieta Labra; Claudio Reyes-Olivares; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez; Nelson A Velásquez; Mario Penna; Paul H Delano; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Examining the effectiveness of discriminant function analysis and cluster analysis in species identification of male field crickets based on their calling songs.

Authors:  Ranjana Jaiswara; Diptarup Nandi; Rohini Balakrishnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.