Literature DB >> 1511262

The effects of body size on functional properties of middle ear systems of anuran amphibians.

T E Hetherington1.   

Abstract

Both tympanic and nontympanic pathways of sound reception are utilized by anuran amphibians. The relationship between body size and the acoustic responsiveness of various body surfaces that may serve as pathways for sound reception in anurans was analyzed. The motion of the different surfaces (tympanum, lateral body wall, lateral head surface, and dorsal shoulder surface) produced by sound was measured with a laser vibrometer in anuran species. The frequency response and amplitude levels of motion of these body surfaces clearly were linked with size. In all animals, nontympanic surfaces were most responsive to low frequencies, and the tympanum was most responsive to high frequencies. However, the responsiveness of nontympanic surfaces was greater, and extended to higher frequencies, in small anurans. In the smallest animals studied, nontympanic surfaces were often more responsive than the tympanum up to frequencies as high as 2500 Hz. In larger anurans, nontympanic responsiveness tended to decrease, and tympanic responsiveness tended to increase. In the largest animals studied, the tympanum was the most responsive surface at all except very low frequencies below about 200-300 Hz. These results suggest that small anurans can utilize nontympanic pathways for effective sound reception over a broad frequency range, whereas large anurans are more restricted to using a standard tympanic middle ear for hearing. This effect of body size on the utility of nontympanic sound reception may explain evolutionary patterns of tympanic ear reduction and loss observed in several small species of anurans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1511262     DOI: 10.1159/000114111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  6 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses to airborne sounds in the aquatic frog Xenopus laevis: correlation with middle ear characteristics.

Authors:  Bharti Katbamna; John A Brown; Melissa Collard; Charles F Ide
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Earless toads sense low frequencies but miss the high notes.

Authors:  Molly C Womack; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Luis A Coloma; Juan C Chaparro; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Comparative and developmental patterns of amphibious auditory function in salamanders.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Zeyl; Carol E Johnston
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Authors:  Grace Capshaw; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.308

5.  Postmetamorphic changes in auditory sensitivity of the bullfrog midbrain.

Authors:  S S Boatright-Horowitz; A M Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; B E McClelland; A S Rand
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.836

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.