Literature DB >> 17989259

Genomic regulatory blocks underlie extensive microsynteny conservation in insects.

Pär G Engström1, Shannan J Ho Sui, Oyvind Drivenes, Thomas S Becker, Boris Lenhard.   

Abstract

Insect genomes contain larger blocks of conserved gene order (microsynteny) than would be expected under a random breakage model of chromosome evolution. We present evidence that microsynteny has been retained to keep large arrays of highly conserved noncoding elements (HCNEs) intact. These arrays span key developmental regulatory genes, forming genomic regulatory blocks (GRBs). We recently described GRBs in vertebrates, where most HCNEs function as enhancers and HCNE arrays specify complex expression programs of their target genes. Here we present a comparison of five Drosophila genomes showing that HCNE density peaks centrally in large synteny blocks containing multiple genes. Besides developmental regulators that are likely targets of HCNE enhancers, HCNE arrays often span unrelated neighboring genes. We describe differences in core promoters between the target genes and the unrelated genes that offer an explanation for the differences in their responsiveness to enhancers. We show examples of a striking correspondence between boundaries of synteny blocks, HCNE arrays, and Polycomb binding regions, confirming that the synteny blocks correspond to regulatory domains. Although few noncoding elements are highly conserved between Drosophila and the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae, we find that A. gambiae regions orthologous to Drosophila GRBs contain an equivalent distribution of noncoding elements highly conserved in the yellow fever mosquito Aëdes aegypti and coincide with regions of ancient microsynteny between Drosophila and mosquitoes. The structural and functional equivalence between insect and vertebrate GRBs marks them as an ancient feature of metazoan genomes and as a key to future studies of development and gene regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17989259      PMCID: PMC2099597          DOI: 10.1101/gr.6669607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  64 in total

Review 1.  Core promoters: active contributors to combinatorial gene regulation.

Authors:  S T Smale
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Analysis of vertebrate SCL loci identifies conserved enhancers.

Authors:  B Göttgens; L M Barton; J G Gilbert; A J Bench; M J Sanchez; S Bahn; S Mistry; D Grafham; A McMurray; M Vaudin; E Amaya; D R Bentley; A R Green; A M Sinclair
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Ultraconserved elements in the human genome.

Authors:  Gill Bejerano; Michael Pheasant; Igor Makunin; Stuart Stephen; W James Kent; John S Mattick; David Haussler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A gene expression map for the euchromatic genome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Viktor Stolc; Zareen Gauhar; Christopher Mason; Gabor Halasz; Marinus F van Batenburg; Scott A Rifkin; Sujun Hua; Tine Herreman; Waraporn Tongprasit; Paolo Emilio Barbano; Harmen J Bussemaker; Kevin P White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Role of the multifunctional CDP/Cut/Cux homeodomain transcription factor in regulating differentiation, cell growth and development.

Authors:  A Nepveu
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2001-05-30       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Promoter specificity mediates the independent regulation of neighboring genes.

Authors:  C Merli; D E Bergstrom; J A Cygan; R K Blackman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Molecular organization of the decapentaplegic gene in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R D St Johnston; F M Hoffmann; R K Blackman; D Segal; R Grimaila; R W Padgett; H A Irick; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Identification of minimal enhancer elements sufficient for Pax3 expression in neural crest and implication of Tead2 as a regulator of Pax3.

Authors:  Rita C Milewski; Neil C Chi; Jun Li; Christopher Brown; Min Min Lu; Jonathan A Epstein
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Proximodistal subdivision of Drosophila legs and wings: the elbow-no ocelli gene complex.

Authors:  Ulrich Weihe; Ruslan Dorfman; Mathias F Wernet; Stephen M Cohen; Marco Milán
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Compatibility between enhancers and promoters determines the transcriptional specificity of gooseberry and gooseberry neuro in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  X Li; M Noll
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  108 in total

1.  An ancient genomic regulatory block conserved across bilaterians and its dismantling in tetrapods by retrogene replacement.

Authors:  Ignacio Maeso; Manuel Irimia; Juan J Tena; Esther González-Pérez; David Tran; Vydianathan Ravi; Byrappa Venkatesh; Sonsoles Campuzano; José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Metazoan promoters: emerging characteristics and insights into transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Boris Lenhard; Albin Sandelin; Piero Carninci
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Fragile regions and not functional constraints predominate in shaping gene organization in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Marcin von Grotthuss; Michael Ashburner; José M Ranz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Identifying regulatory elements in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Leelavati Narlikar; Ivan Ovcharenko
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2009-06-04

Review 5.  Using retroviruses as a mutagenesis tool to explore the zebrafish genome.

Authors:  Li-En Jao; Lisette Maddison; Wenbiao Chen; Shawn M Burgess
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2008-10-31

6.  Regulatory divergence of the duplicated chromosomal loci sox11a/b by subpartitioning and sequence evolution of enhancers in zebrafish.

Authors:  Pavla Navratilova; David Fredman; Boris Lenhard; Thomas S Becker
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Conserved cluster organization of insect Runx genes.

Authors:  Riyue Bao; Markus Friedrich
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Deeply conserved chordate noncoding sequences preserve genome synteny but do not drive gene duplicate retention.

Authors:  Andrew L Hufton; Susanne Mathia; Helene Braun; Udo Georgi; Hans Lehrach; Martin Vingron; Albert J Poustka; Georgia Panopoulou
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 9.  Promoting developmental transcription.

Authors:  Uwe Ohler; David A Wassarman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Multigenome DNA sequence conservation identifies Hox cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Steven G Kuntz; Erich M Schwarz; John A DeModena; Tristan De Buysscher; Diane Trout; Hiroaki Shizuya; Paul W Sternberg; Barbara J Wold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.