Literature DB >> 8313825

What is the optimal time window in symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data?

H G Lam1, R Breumelhof, J M Roelofs, G P Van Berge Henegouwen, A J Smout.   

Abstract

Since noncardiac chest pain is the only well-established indication for 24-hr esophageal pH and pressure recording, the analysis of the association between chest pain episodes and esophageal motility abnormalities or reflux is the most important part of data analysis in 24-hr monitoring. Until now, different time windows have arbitrarily been used by various research groups. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal time window for symptom analysis in 24-hr esophageal pH and pressure monitoring. For this purpose repetitive symptom association analysis was carried out, using time windows of various onsets and durations. For each time window, the symptom indices for reflux and dysmotility were calculated. The symptom index for both reflux and dysmotility showed a gradual increase for windows with increasingly early onset, following a pattern that would be predicted on the basis of Poisson's theory. However, both indices had a relatively sharp cutoff point at 2 min before the onset of pain. Both indices only showed a predictable gradual increase when the time window starting at -2 min was extended beyond the moment of pain onset. It is concluded that the optimal time window for symptom analysis in 24-hr esophageal pH and pressure recording begins at 2 min before the onset of pain and ends at the onset of pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8313825     DOI: 10.1007/bf02090215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  9 in total

1.  Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis.

Authors:  A J Smout; M Breedijk; C van der Zouw; L M Akkermans
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring.

Authors:  L Peters; L Maas; D Petty; C Dalton; D Penner; W Wu; D Castell; J Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J E Richter; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data in unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  R Breumelhof; J H Nadorp; L M Akkermans; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain: value of ambulatory esophageal pH and motility monitoring.

Authors:  E E Soffer; P Scalabrini; D L Wingate
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Acute noncardiac chest pain in a coronary care unit. Evaluation by 24-hour pressure and pH recording of the esophagus.

Authors:  H G Lam; W Dekker; G Kan; M Breedijk; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  24 hour ambulatory oesophageal motility monitoring: how should motility data be analysed?

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  24-hour recording of esophageal pressure and pH in patients with noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  J Janssens; G Vantrappen; G Ghillebert
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH and pressure recordings v provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of oesophageal origin.

Authors:  G Ghillebert; J Janssens; G Vantrappen; F Nevens; J Piessens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 23.059

  9 in total
  30 in total

1.  Normal 24-hour Ambulatory Esophageal pH Values in Koreans.

Authors:  Won Moon; Moo In Park; Gyung Mi Kim; Kyu Jong Kim; Seun Ja Park; Hyo Sung Mun; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 2.  Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; W L Curvers; R Timmer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Significance of gastroesophageal refluxate in relation to physical, chemical, and spatiotemporal characteristics in symptomatic intensive care unit neonates.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Juan Peng; Chin Yee Chan; Rebecca Moore; Lai Wei; Soledad Fernandez; Carlo DI Lorenzo
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 5.  BSPGHAN Motility Working Group position statement: paediatric multichannel intraluminal pH impedance monitoring-indications, methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Mohamed Mutalib; David Rawat; Keith Lindley; Osvaldo Borrelli; Steve Perring; Marcus K H Auth; Nikhil Thapar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-15

6.  Exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in recurrent chest pain.

Authors:  Jacek Budzyński
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Weakly acidic reflux in patients with chronic unexplained cough during 24 hour pressure, pH, and impedance monitoring.

Authors:  D Sifrim; L Dupont; K Blondeau; X Zhang; J Tack; J Janssens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  How to Interpret Ambulatory 24 hr Esophageal pH Monitoring.

Authors:  Gwang Ha Kim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  Utility of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH and motility monitoring in noncardiac chest pain: report of 90 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Gloria Lacima; Luis Grande; Manuel Pera; Antonio Francino; Emilio Ros
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Reflux monitoring: current status.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.