Literature DB >> 2767498

24 hour ambulatory oesophageal motility monitoring: how should motility data be analysed?

J E Richter1, D O Castell.   

Abstract

Ambulatory oesophageal motility/pH monitoring permits accurate detection of oesophageal events during spontaneous chest pain episodes. Opinions differ, however, about the methods to review the extensive motility data and the definition of abnormal motility changes. We studied 30 patients (18 women, age 46 years) with suspected oesophageal chest pain using a portable recording system attached to a 4.5 mm catheter with pressure transducers 3 and 8 cm and pH probe 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS). An event marker was triggered by the patient for chest pain. In the patient's diary, pain was recorded on a scale of increasing severity 1-10. Two methods of analysis were used to assess 24 hour motility data. The 24 hour technique sampled five minute asymptomatic baselines throughout the study to define the patient's normal range of oesophageal motility. The second technique used only the 10 minute period immediately before each chest pain episode as the asymptomatic baseline. Chest pain episodes were defined as abnormal if associated with pH less than 4 or motility changes not present during the asymptomatic baseline analysis: 135 chest pain episodes were recorded. The method of motility analysis significantly (p less than 0.01) changed the number of chest pain episodes associated with abnormal motility: 24 hour technique - 14 episodes (10%) versus a 2.5-fold increase with the 10 minute baseline technique - 33 episodes (24%). Acid related pain episodes were similar in both groups - 13%. The majority of chest pain episodes had no association with abnormal motility or acid reflux. Increasing chest pain severity was inversely correlated with the presence of abnormal oesophageal events. We conclude that limited analysis of 24 hour motility data may over diagnose motility related chest pain events and lead to inappropriate medical or surgical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2767498      PMCID: PMC1434182          DOI: 10.1136/gut.30.8.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  20 in total

1.  Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  J B Hollis; D O Castell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring.

Authors:  L Peters; L Maas; D Petty; C Dalton; D Penner; W Wu; D Castell; J Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Manometric findings during spontaneous chest pain in patients with presumed esophageal "spasms".

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; D W Landau; J L Schlachter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Psychiatric illness and contraction abnormalities of the esophagus.

Authors:  R E Clouse; P J Lustman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain.

Authors:  J E Richter; C F Barish; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred to manometry. A new approach to manometric classification.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The irritable oesophagus--a frequent cause of angina-like pain.

Authors:  G Vantrappen; J Janssens; G Ghillebert
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Psychological comparison of patients with nutcracker esophagus and irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  J E Richter; W F Obrecht; L A Bradley; L D Young; K O Anderson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.

Authors:  P O Katz; C B Dalton; J E Richter; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenterology.

Authors:  L J O'Donnell; E M Alstead; M J Farthing
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Ambulatory 23 hour recording of intraoesophageal pressures in normal volunteers: a propagation analysis from one proximal and two distal recording sites.

Authors:  S Kruse-Andersen; L Wallin; T Madsen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  How long should a long-term esophageal motility study be?

Authors:  S M Freys; K H Fuchs; M Fein; J Maroske; A Thiede
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Transition from nutcracker esophagus to achalasia.

Authors:  A Anggiansah; N F Bright; M McCullagh; W J Owen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Does diet affect values obtained during prolonged ambulatory pressure monitoring.

Authors:  S Langevin; S F DeNuna; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Long-term esophageal manometry in healthy subjects. Evaluation of normal values and influence of age.

Authors:  R J Adamek; M Wegener; M Wienbeck; B Gielen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in patients with primary esophageal motor disorders.

Authors:  H J Stein
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Utility of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH and motility monitoring in noncardiac chest pain: report of 90 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Gloria Lacima; Luis Grande; Manuel Pera; Antonio Francino; Emilio Ros
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Indications, technique, and clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in a surgical practice.

Authors:  H J Stein; T R DeMeester
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Oesophageal motor response to reflux is not impaired in reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  R Timmer; R Breumelhof; J H Nadorp; A J Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.