PURPOSE: To identify characteristics and outcomes of patients who use physician assistants and nurse practitioners (PA/NPs) as a usual source of care. METHODS: Cross sectional analysis using the telephone and mail surveys of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS), a prospective cohort study of Wisconsin high school graduates and selected siblings (n = 6,803). FINDINGS: Individuals from metropolitan (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.29-0.54) and micropolitan (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.44-0.95) areas were less likely to utilize PA/NPs than participants from rural locations. Participants without insurance or with public insurance other than Medicare were more likely than those with private insurance to utilize PA/NPs (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.02-2.86). Patients of PA/NPs were more likely to be women (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.34-2.34), younger (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92-0.98) and have lower extroversion scores (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.68-0.96). Participants utilizing PA/NPs reported lower perceived access (beta=-0.22, 95% CI =-0.35-0.09) than those utilizing doctors. PA/NP utilization was associated with an increased likelihood of chiropractor visits (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.15-2.15) and decreased likelihood of a complete health exams (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55-0.99) or mammograms (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45-0.93). There were no significant differences in self-rated health or difficulties/delays in receiving care. CONCLUSIONS: Populations served by PA/NPs and doctors differ demographically but not in complexity. Though perceived access to care was lower for patients of PA/NPs, there were few differences in utilization and no differences in difficulties/delays in care or outcomes. This suggests that PA/NPs are acting as primary care providers to underserved patients with a range of disease severity, findings which have important implications for policy, including clinician workforce and reimbursement issues.
PURPOSE: To identify characteristics and outcomes of patients who use physician assistants and nurse practitioners (PA/NPs) as a usual source of care. METHODS: Cross sectional analysis using the telephone and mail surveys of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS), a prospective cohort study of Wisconsin high school graduates and selected siblings (n = 6,803). FINDINGS: Individuals from metropolitan (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.29-0.54) and micropolitan (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.44-0.95) areas were less likely to utilize PA/NPs than participants from rural locations. Participants without insurance or with public insurance other than Medicare were more likely than those with private insurance to utilize PA/NPs (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.02-2.86). Patients of PA/NPs were more likely to be women (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.34-2.34), younger (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92-0.98) and have lower extroversion scores (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.68-0.96). Participants utilizing PA/NPs reported lower perceived access (beta=-0.22, 95% CI =-0.35-0.09) than those utilizing doctors. PA/NP utilization was associated with an increased likelihood of chiropractor visits (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.15-2.15) and decreased likelihood of a complete health exams (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55-0.99) or mammograms (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45-0.93). There were no significant differences in self-rated health or difficulties/delays in receiving care. CONCLUSIONS: Populations served by PA/NPs and doctors differ demographically but not in complexity. Though perceived access to care was lower for patients of PA/NPs, there were few differences in utilization and no differences in difficulties/delays in care or outcomes. This suggests that PA/NPs are acting as primary care providers to underserved patients with a range of disease severity, findings which have important implications for policy, including clinician workforce and reimbursement issues.
Authors: Elizabeth R Lenz; Mary O'Neil Mundinger; Robert L Kane; Sarah C Hopkins; Susan X Lin Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Douglas W Roblin; David H Howard; Edmund R Becker; E Kathleen Adams; Melissa H Roberts Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Steven C Marcus; Mark Olfson; Terri Tanielian; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jessica R Schumacher; Whitney P Witt; Mari Palta; Noelle K Loconte; Susan M Heidrich; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Nancy Pandhi; Maureen A Smith Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Christine M Everett; Carolyn T Thorpe; Mari Palta; Pascale Carayon; Valerie J Gilchrist; Maureen A Smith Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Xuewei Chen; Heather Orom; Jennifer L Hay; Erika A Waters; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Marc T Kiviniemi Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.333