Literature DB >> 8311141

Stapled ileoanal anastomosis without a temporary ileostomy.

H J Sugerman1, H H Newsome.   

Abstract

Stapled J-pouch ileoanal operations were performed in 75 patients (35 men, 40 women; 72 with ulcerative colitis, 3 with familial polyposis) without an ileostomy in 68 (43 taking prednisone, 12 emergent surgery, 8 completion proctectomy with ileostomy takedown). The seven primary ileostomies were due to technical difficulties in two patients and toxic colitis in four patients. No patients were lost to follow-up. Of patients followed for more than 1 month, 96% had perfect daytime control, 86% had no nocturnal accidents, and 73% had no nocturnal spotting. Mucosa between the dentate line and the anastomosis averaged 1.1 +/- 1.0 cm, with the anastomosis at, or below, the dentate line in 16 patients, of whom 14 had excellent continence. Stools in 24 hours averaged 6.9 +/- 0.3, of which 1.8 +/- 0.2 were at night. Stool frequency was unrelated to gender, anastomotic distance from the dentate line, or age; however, patients 50 years of age or older had more problems with nocturnal fecal control than those younger than 50 years of age. Anastomotic leaks (four), cuff abscess (one), pouch leaks (two), and pelvic abscesses (three) were treated with drainage in all patients and ileostomy in five. Pouchitis occurred in 31% of patients and responded to oral antibiotic therapy. Acute complications were fewer, functional pouches greater, stool control better, and overall hospitalization shorter (all p < 0.01) than those in our 63 patients with a mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8311141     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90054-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

1.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery.

Authors:  Peter W G Carne; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

3.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; J G Meador; H H Newsome; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Postoperative functional outcomes and complications of partially intraanal canal anastomosis in stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Akira Sugita; Kazutaka Koganei; Kenji Tatsumi; Ryo Futatsuki; Hirosuke Kuroki; Kyoko Yamada; Hideaki Kimura; Tsuneo Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  U A Heuschen; U Hinz; E H Allemeyer; M Lucas; G Heuschen; C Herfarth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa.

Authors:  W T Reilly; J H Pemberton; B G Wolff; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine; W J Litchy; P B McIntyre
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Surgical considerations in FAP-related pouch surgery: Could we do better?

Authors:  Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  [Surgical aspects of indications and techniques for adenomatous polyposis variants].

Authors:  Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.