Literature DB >> 31175423

Postoperative functional outcomes and complications of partially intraanal canal anastomosis in stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Akira Sugita1, Kazutaka Koganei2, Kenji Tatsumi2, Ryo Futatsuki2, Hirosuke Kuroki2, Kyoko Yamada2, Hideaki Kimura3, Tsuneo Fukushima4.   

Abstract

AIM: For ulcerative colitis (UC), stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) reportedly results in better bowel function than does IPAA with mucosectomy. However, a potential cancer risk in the remnant mucosa has been observed. The clinical results of IPAA by double stapling technique (DS-IPAA) in which the anastomotic line was on the dentate line at posterior wall and the top of anal canal at anterior wall ("Partially intraanal canal anastomosis": PICA) to reduce the remnant mucosa were evaluated.
METHODS: Clinical results of PICA were retrospectively compared with those by DS-IPAA with anastomosis at above the anal canal on 1 year after open surgery. Of 211 UC cases that underwent DS-IPAA, 146 cases (69%) with PICA who were confirmed by the squamous epithelium on the posterior part of the distal donuts were included. Sixty-five cases with anastomosis above the anal canal were evaluated as the control. One stage surgery underwent in 95% of PICA and 93% of control.
RESULTS: One year after surgery, each group had six bowel movements daily. Nighttime evacuation was found in 16% of PICA and in 20% of control. Soiling was found in 1% of PICA and 4.8% of control. After one stage operation, anastomotic leakage that needed ileostomy was observed in 0.7% of PICA and 3% of control.
CONCLUSION: Partially intraanal canal anastomosis (PICA) can reduce anal canal mucosa with the same postoperative bowel function and complication rate as DS-IPAA above the anal canal. This procedure may be feasible for UC patients who can tolerate this procedure in terms of decreasing postoperative cancer risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Partially intraanal canal anastomosis; Postoperative bowel function; Postoperative complications; Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis; Ulcerative colitis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31175423     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03322-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  28 in total

1.  Rectal cancer as a complication of stapled IPAA.

Authors:  Neil Hyman
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.325

2.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Adenocarcinoma in the anal canal after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis using a double stapling technique: report of a case.

Authors:  Sotirios Baratsis; Filippos Hadjidimitriou; Maria Christodoulou; Konstantina Lariou
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?

Authors:  Stefanie J Schluender; Ling Mei; Huiying Yang; Phillip R Fleshner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  V W Fazio; M G O'Riordain; I C Lavery; J M Church; P Lau; S A Strong; T Hull
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients.

Authors:  Hasan T Kirat; Feza H Remzi; Ravi P Kiran; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Retained mucosa after double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  S L Schmitt; S D Wexner; F V Lucas; K James; J J Nogueras; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years.

Authors:  Feza H Remzi; Victor W Fazio; Conor P Delaney; Miriam Preen; Adrian Ormsby; Jane Bast; Michael G O'Riordain; Scott A Strong; James M Church; Robert E Petras; Terry Gramlich; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Chronic inflammatory changes in the anal transition zone after stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is mucosectomy a superior alternative?

Authors:  Mark T Silvestri; Roger D Hurst; Michele A Rubin; Fabrizio Michelassi; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Systematic review of dysplasia after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  M Scarpa; P J van Koperen; D T Ubbink; D W Hommes; F J W Ten Kate; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Postoperative complications, bowel function, and prognosis in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis-a single-center observational study of 320 patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kuwabara; Hideaki Kimura; Reiko Kunisaki; Kenji Tatsumi; Kazutaka Koganei; Akira Sugita; Kenji Katsumata; Akihiko Tsuchida; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.