Literature DB >> 8306416

Randomized clinical trial of mitomycin-C with or without pretreatment with WR-2721 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

E A Poplin1, P LoRusso, J J Lokich, J J Gullo, P D Leming, J J Schulz, S R Veach, W McCulloch, L Baker, P Schein.   

Abstract

The use of mitomycin for metastatic colorectal cancer has been limited by mitomycin's myelosuppressive potential. The objective of this randomized study was to determine whether WR-2721 would decrease the hematologic toxicity of mitomycin in patients with colorectal cancer resistant to fluorouracil-based therapy. Ninety-seven patients with refractory colorectal cancer were randomized to receive either mitomycin 20 mg/m2 only or the same dose of mitomycin after pretreatment with WR-2721, 910 mg/m2. The principal toxicity in both groups was thrombocytopenia. The platelet nadirs were lower in patients receiving single-agent mitomycin (P = 0.026). Surprisingly, no clinical complete or partial responses were noted in either group, and survival was not different between the two groups. Thus, while WR-2721 decreased the thrombocytopenia associated with mitomycin therapy, mitomycin was ineffective in the treatment of refractory colorectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8306416     DOI: 10.1007/BF00686271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

1.  Clinical trials of WR-2721 and cis-platinum.

Authors:  D Glover; S Grabelsky; K Fox; C Weiler; L Cannon; J Glick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Clinical study of mitomycin C (NSC-26980) in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F J Ansfield
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1969-10

3.  Mitomycin C therapy in advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  C G Moertel; R J Reitemeier; R G Hahn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Randomized study of continuous infusion fluorouracil versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N Kemeny; K Israel; D Niedzwiecki; D Chapman; J Botet; B Minsky; V Vinciguerra; R Rosenbluth; B Bosselli; C Cochran
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  WR-2721 protects against the hematologic toxicity of cyclophosphamide: a controlled phase II trial.

Authors:  D Glover; J H Glick; C Weiler; S Hurowitz; M M Kligerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Comparison of continuously infused 5-fluorouracil with bolus injection in treatment of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  P Seifert; L H Baker; M L Reed; V K Vaitkevicius
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Phase II study of profiromycin vs mitomycin-C utilizing acute intermittent schedules.

Authors:  L H Baker; R M Izbicki; V K Vaitkevicius
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1976

8.  A prospective randomized comparison of continuous infusion fluorouracil with a conventional bolus schedule in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program Study.

Authors:  J J Lokich; J D Ahlgren; J J Gullo; J A Philips; J G Fryer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 44.544

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Response rates--an evolution.

Authors:  E Poplin; L Baker
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Clinical and preclinical modulation of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in patients with cancer.

Authors:  K Hoekman; W J van der Vijgh; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Effects of amifostine on cisplatin induced DNA adduct formation and toxicity in malignant glioma and normal tissues in rat.

Authors:  P Bergström; A Johnsson; T Bergenheim; R Henriksson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Chemoprotectants: a review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  M Links; C Lewis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  A risk-benefit assessment of amifostine in cytoprotection.

Authors:  M Mabro; S Faivre; E Raymond
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Amifostine: an update on its clinical status as a cytoprotectant in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy and its potential therapeutic application in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  C R Culy; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Comparative analysis of perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen in appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Terence C Chua; Winston Liauw; Jing Zhao; David L Morris
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Zebrafish as a model system to screen radiation modifiers.

Authors:  Misun Hwang; Cha Yong; Luigi Moretti; Bo Lu
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  A phase I dose escalation study of a pharmacobiologically based scheduling of capecitabine and mitomycin C in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Marisa Hill; Angela Campbell; Kavitha Kosuri; James Thomas; Miguel Villalona-Calero
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Amifostine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential as a radioprotector and cytotoxic chemoprotector.

Authors:  C M Spencer; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.