Literature DB >> 8033304

Response rates--an evolution.

E Poplin1, L Baker.   

Abstract

The documented frequency of response of cancers to common chemotherapy agents and combinations appears to have decreased over the decades. Multiple reasons exist for this decline including: changes in eligibility and evaluability criteria; changes in the type of patients entered onto trial; and, altered criteria for response and methods for response assessment. The disinclination to publish negative results also permits a bias in a favor of overestimating a drug's efficacy. Circumspection now is advised in assessing data from older trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8033304     DOI: 10.1007/bf00686046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  17 in total

1.  The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer.

Authors:  C G Moertel; J A Hanley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Publication bias and clinical trials.

Authors:  K Dickersin; S Chan; T C Chalmers; H S Sacks; H Smith
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1987-12

Review 3.  The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  W Hryniuk; H Bush
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Phase III comparison of doxorubicin and dacarbazine given by bolus versus infusion in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  M Zalupski; B Metch; S Balcerzak; W S Fletcher; R Chapman; J D Bonnet; G R Weiss; J Ryan; R S Benjamin; L H Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Applications of dose intensity to problems in chemotherapy of breast and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W M Hryniuk; A Figueredo; M Goodyear
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Phase II study of profiromycin vs mitomycin-C utilizing acute intermittent schedules.

Authors:  L H Baker; R M Izbicki; V K Vaitkevicius
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1976

7.  A prospective randomized comparison of continuous infusion fluorouracil with a conventional bolus schedule in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program Study.

Authors:  J J Lokich; J D Ahlgren; J J Gullo; J A Philips; J G Fryer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Combination chemotherapy using adriamycin, DTIC, cyclophosphamide, and actinomycin D for advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized comparative trial. A phase III, Southwest Oncology Group Study (7613).

Authors:  L H Baker; J Frank; G Fine; S P Balcerzak; R L Stephens; W J Stuckey; S Rivkin; J Saiki; J H Ward
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumors.

Authors:  P T Lavin; G Flowerdew
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response.

Authors:  D Warr; S McKinney; I Tannock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.