Literature DB >> 30936165

Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis.

Diane Korb1, François Goffinet2, Aurélien Seco2, Sylvie Chevret2, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short-term maternal complications of cesarean delivery remain uncertain because of confounding by indication. Our objective was to assess whether cesarean delivery is associated with severe acute intra- or postpartum maternal morbidity compared with vaginal delivery, overall and according to the timing of the cesarean.
METHODS: We performed a case-control analysis using data from EPIMOMS, a prospective population-based study of deliveries at 22 gestation weeks or later from 6 regions of France in 2012-2013. Cases of intra- or postpartum severe acute maternal morbidity that were not a result of a condition present before delivery were compared with controls randomly selected in a 1/50 ratio. Associations between delivery modes and severe acute maternal morbidity were estimated in a propensity score-matched sample.
RESULTS: Among 182 300 deliveries, we identified 1444 cases and 3464 controls. The proportion of cesarean delivery was significantly higher among cases than controls (36.0% v. 18.2%). In the propensity score-matched analysis, cesarean deliveries were significantly associated with a higher risk of severe acute maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.2). This association increased with maternal age and was particularly marked for women aged 35 years or older (adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9-4.4). This increased risk was significant for cesarean deliveries during labour in women of all age groups and for those before labour only in women aged 35 years or older (adjusted OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.3-11.0).
INTERPRETATION: Cesarean delivery is associated with a higher risk of severe acute maternal morbidity than vaginal delivery, particularly in women aged 35 years and older. Clinical decisions regarding delivery mode should account for this excess risk accordingly.
© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30936165      PMCID: PMC6443524          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.181067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  38 in total

1.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Yariv Yogev; Nir Melamed; Ron Bardin; Kinneret Tenenbaum-Gavish; Gadi Ben-Shitrit; Avi Ben-Haroush
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Cesarean delivery on request: where do we go from here?

Authors:  James R Scott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Elodie Carmona; Marie-Hélene Bouvier-Colle; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment.

Authors:  M Laopaiboon; P Lumbiganon; N Intarut; R Mori; T Ganchimeg; J P Vogel; J P Souza; A M Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  J J Zwart; J M Richters; F Ory; J I P de Vries; K W M Bloemenkamp; J van Roosmalen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  José Villar; Guillermo Carroli; Nelly Zavaleta; Allan Donner; Daniel Wojdyla; Anibal Faundes; Alejandro Velazco; Vicente Bataglia; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Eliette Valladares; Archana Shah; Liana Campodónico; Mariana Romero; Sofia Reynoso; Karla Simônia de Pádua; Daniel Giordano; Marius Kublickas; Arnaldo Acosta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-30

9.  Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Zarko Alfirevic; Patsy Spark; Peter Brocklehurst; Marian Knight
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oonagh E Keag; Jane E Norman; Sarah J Stock
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  13 in total

1.  Key considerations when comparing outcomes by mode of delivery raise questions about study validity and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Neda Razaz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Delivery options and risk of severe acute maternal morbidity.

Authors:  K S Joseph; Amélie Boutin; Sarka Lisonkova
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Maternal mortality in the United States: research gaps, opportunities, and priorities.

Authors:  Juanita J Chinn; Esther Eisenberg; Shavon Artis Dickerson; Rosalind B King; Nahida Chakhtoura; Issel Anne L Lim; Katherine L Grantz; Charisee Lamar; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The Impact of Severe Maternal Morbidity on Very Preterm Infant Outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer Zeitlin; Natalia N Egorova; Teresa Janevic; Paul L Hebert; Elodie Lebreton; Amy Balbierz; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Association of Caesarean delivery and breastfeeding difficulties during the delivery hospitalization: a community-based cohort of women and full-term infants in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Joyce Singh; Natalie V Scime; Kathleen H Chaput
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 6.  Acquisition of microbiota according to the type of birth: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gabriela Diniz Pinto Coelho; Lilian Fernandes Arial Ayres; Daniela Sezilio Barreto; Bruno David Henriques; Mara Rúbia Maciel Cardoso Prado; Camila Mendes Dos Passos
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2021-07-19

7.  Pregnancy Complications in Women with Weight Loss Surgery Compared to a Non-Surgical Population of Women with Obesity.

Authors:  Kara M Christopher; Ahmed Abdelsalam; Louise Flick; Pamela Xaverius
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Antepartum severe maternal morbidity: A population-based study of risk factors and delivery outcomes.

Authors:  Mégane Raineau; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Aurélien Seco; Marie-Pierre Bonnet
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.103

9.  Women's experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Lilian Peters; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Warren Keedle; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Causes contributing to the excess maternal mortality risk for women 35 and over, United States, 2016-2017.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Marie Thoma; Eugene Declercq; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.