Literature DB >> 8294893

The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials.

A Osman1, C M Moore.   

Abstract

We sought to measure separately the motor potentials for each of 2 concurrent tasks and to use these measurements to identify the locus of dual-task interference. Lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) were measured in the psychological refractory period paradigm, in which a separate response is required to each of 2 successive signals. As the interval between the signals decreased, the 2 reaction time (RT) tasks increasingly overlapped and the 2nd RT was prolonged. The LRP for the 2nd task was also delayed but maintained a constant temporal relation with the 2nd RT and sometimes preceded the 1st-task RT. The results indicate that (a) independent measures of the LRP can be obtained for each of 2 concurrent tasks, (b) slowing of the 2nd task was caused by a delay in processes that precede LRP onset, and (c) the 1st task may cease to interfere with the 2nd considerably before producing an overt response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8294893     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.6.1292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  34 in total

1.  Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; P J Gianaros
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination.

Authors:  W Sommer; H Leuthold; T Schubert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  Temporal organization of covert motor processes during response selection and preparation.

Authors:  Allen Osman; Cathleen M Moore; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Response time distributions: some simple effects of factors selectively influencing mental processes.

Authors:  R Schweickert; M Giorgini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

5.  Dissociating sources of dual-task interference using human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Alicia M Helion; Jessica A Hurdelbrink; Brian Pasieka
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

6.  Central processing overlap modulates P3 latency.

Authors:  R Dell'acqua; P Jolicoeur; F Vespignani; P Toffanin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved FMRI.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Jason Ivanoff; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Statistically robust measurement of evoked response onset latencies.

Authors:  Benjamin Letham; Tommi Raij
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Parallel central processing between tasks: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eruc Ruthruff; Shulan Hsieh; Yen-Ting Yu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

10.  Event-related brain potentials support episodic-retrieval explanations of flanker negative priming.

Authors:  Jutta Stahl; Henning Gibbons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.