Literature DB >> 20974175

Statistically robust measurement of evoked response onset latencies.

Benjamin Letham1, Tommi Raij.   

Abstract

Onset latencies of evoked responses are useful for determining delays in sensory pathways and for indicating spread of activity between brain areas, therefore inferring causality. Previous studies have applied several different methods and parameters for detecting onsets, mainly utilizing thresholds based on the mean and standard deviation (SD) of the pre-stimulus "baseline" time window, or using t-tests of group data to determine when the response first differs significantly from the baseline. However, these methods are not statistically robust, have low power when the baseline data are not normally distributed, and are heavily influenced by outliers in the baseline. Here, we examine using a modified boxplot method known as the "median rule" for determining onset latencies. This rule makes no assumptions about the baseline distribution, is resistant to outliers, and can be applied to individual level data therefore allowing intersubject and interregional comparisons. We first show with simulations that the median rule is significantly less sensitive to outliers in the baseline than the SD method. We then use simulations to demonstrate the effect of skewness on onset latencies. Finally, we use magnetoencephalography (MEG) to show that the median rule can be easily applied to real data and gives reasonable results. In most situations the different methods give similar results, which enhances comparability across studies, but in data sets with a high noise level there is a clear advantage to using a statistically robust method. In conclusion, the median rule is an excellent method for estimating onset latencies in evoked responses. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20974175      PMCID: PMC3010493          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  23 in total

1.  Modern robust data analysis methods: measures of central tendency.

Authors:  Rand R Wilcox; H J Keselman
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-09

2.  Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data.

Authors:  Wilkin Chau; Anthony R McIntosh; Stephen E Robinson; Matthias Schulz; Christo Pantev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.

Authors:  Eric Maris; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition.

Authors:  K Allan; M D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Signal detection in averaged evoked potentials: Monte Carlo comparison of the sensitivity of different methods.

Authors:  A Achim
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11

7.  The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies.

Authors:  F T Smulders; A Kok; J L Kenemans; T R Bashore
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1995-11

8.  Onset timing of cross-sensory activations and multisensory interactions in auditory and visual sensory cortices.

Authors:  Tommi Raij; Jyrki Ahveninen; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Thomas Witzel; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Benjamin Letham; Emily Israeli; Cherif Sahyoun; Christos Vasios; Steven Stufflebeam; Matti Hämäläinen; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Time course of error detection and correction in humans: neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Arthur R Kurzbuch; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Word and nonword repetition within- and across-modality: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  M D Rugg; M C Doyle; T Wells
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  4 in total

1.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Delineation of epileptogenic zones with high frequency magnetic source imaging based on kurtosis and skewness.

Authors:  Jing Xiang; Ellen Maue; Hisako Fujiwara; Francesco T Mangano; Hansel Greiner; Jeffrey Tenney
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Specific contributions of ventromedial, anterior cingulate, and lateral prefrontal cortex for attentional selection and stimulus valuation.

Authors:  Daniel Kaping; Martin Vinck; R Matthew Hutchison; Stefan Everling; Thilo Womelsdorf
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Cortical Responsiveness to Nociceptive Stimuli in Patients with Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Do C-Fiber Laser Evoked Potentials Have a Role?

Authors:  Antonino Naro; Margherita Russo; Antonino Leo; Carmela Rifici; Patrizia Pollicino; Placido Bramanti; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.