Literature DB >> 8293376

Utilization of sigmoidoscopy by family physicians in Canada.

S R Glaser1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which sigmoidoscopy is used as an investigative tool by family physicians in Canada.
DESIGN: Retrospective study of data from provincial and territorial health agencies for the fiscal year 1989.
SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All family physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of physicians in each province and territory who performed sigmoidoscopy (flexible and rigid), type of physician (generalist or specialist), number of procedures performed, fee schedule and number of physicians billing medicare in each province and territory.
RESULTS: During the study period 3849 (15.1%) of all family physicians performed rigid sigmoidoscopy; the proportion varied from 3.4% (in Quebec) to 40.0% (in the Northwest Territories). A total of 43,914 rigid sigmoidoscopies were performed by family physicians, representing 23% of all such procedures. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed by 381 (1.5%) of all family physicians; the proportion varied from 0.4% (in Quebec) to 6.8% (in Prince Edward Island). A total of 5361 flexible sigmoidoscopies were performed, representing 6.0% of all such procedures.
CONCLUSION: The proportion of Canadian family physicians who are using sigmoidoscopy, rigid or flexible, as a diagnostic tool is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8293376      PMCID: PMC1486182     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  12 in total

1.  The role of early diagnosis is controlling large bowel cancer.

Authors:  P Sherlock; S J Winawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Use of rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy by family physicians in the United States.

Authors:  R L Buckley; M U Smith; H P Katner
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  [The prevention of rectosigmoid cancer: reality or fiction].

Authors:  C A Muller
Journal:  Rev Med Suisse Romande       Date:  1973-11

4.  Continued assessment of flexible sigmoidoscopy in a family practice residency.

Authors:  R A Johnson; M Quan; W M Rodney
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  ACS report on the cancer-related health checkup.

Authors:  D Eddy
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Why flexible sigmoidoscopy instead of rigid sigmoidoscopy?

Authors:  W M Rodney; E Felmar
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Superiority of the flexible to the rigid sigmoidoscope in routine proctosigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  G Winnan; G Berci; J Panish; T M Talbot; B F Overholt; R W McCallum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Patient response to sigmoidoscopy. A randomized, controlled trial of rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  S J Winawer; C Miller; C Lightdale; E Herbert; R C Ephram; L Gordon; D Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patient response to sigmoidoscopy recommendations via mailed reminders.

Authors:  J Petravage; J Swedberg
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  1 in total

1.  Screening strategies for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G P Cully
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.