Literature DB >> 3171490

Patient response to sigmoidoscopy recommendations via mailed reminders.

J Petravage1, J Swedberg.   

Abstract

The survey reported here was undertaken to determine how many people would schedule a sigmoidoscopy after being informed by letter about the American Cancer Society's (ACS's) recommendations for colorectal screening. Letters (1,024) were sent to all patients aged over 50 years who were registered in a community-based family practice residency program. Four hundred twenty-nine responded. Of those who responded, 16.8 percent indicated interest in a rectal examination, 21 percent were interested in testing their stool for occult blood, 13.1 percent desired a sigmoidoscopy, and 11.7 percent indicated that they had previously had a sigmoidoscopy. The following reasons were given by responders who were not interested in sigmoidoscopy: 42 percent felt good and did not perceive a need, 31 percent were concerned about cost, 12.1 percent were concerned about discomfort, and 8.6 percent stated fear as a reason for their response. Of the 56 patients who indicated interest in a sigmoidoscopy, 10 patients had the procedure done (flexible 60-cm sigmoidoscope). Although the ACS recommends that everyone aged over 50 years have a sigmoidoscopy, few patients in this population who responded have had the procedure done. Encouragement and education for patients in colorectal screening, however, is worthwhile. Two colorectal carcinomas were detected as a result of this survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3171490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  7 in total

1.  Effect of music on patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Matthew-L Bechtold; Rodney-A Perez; Srinivas-R Puli; John-B Marshall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Utilization of sigmoidoscopy by family physicians in Canada.

Authors:  S R Glaser
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Promoting use of colorectal cancer screening tests. Can we change physician behavior?

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; René Salazar; Jonathan P Terdiman; Ginny Gildengorin; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Visual distraction alone for the improvement of colonoscopy-related pain and satisfaction.

Authors:  Shotaro Umezawa; Takuma Higurashi; Shiori Uchiyama; Eiji Sakai; Hidenori Ohkubo; Hiroki Endo; Takashi Nonaka; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Effect of music on patients undergoing colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Matthew L Bechtold; Srinivas R Puli; Mohamed O Othman; Christopher R Bartalos; John B Marshall; Praveen K Roy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Effect of audio and visual distraction on patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  A P De Silva; M A Niriella; Y Nandamuni; S D Nanayakkara; K R P Perera; S K Kodisinghe; K C E Subasinghe; A Pathmeswaran; H J de Silva
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-10-20

7.  Conscious Sedation and Analgesia in Colonoscopy: Ketamine/Propofol Combination has Superior Patient Satisfaction Versus Fentanyl/Propofol.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Khajavi; Azra Emami; Farhad Etezadi; Saeid Safari; Alireza Sharifi; Reza Shariat Moharari
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2013-07-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.