Literature DB >> 8290661

Efficacy and safety of b.i.d. doses of venlafaxine in a dose-response study.

J Mendels1, R Johnston, J Mattes, R Riesenberg.   

Abstract

In this study, 312 depressed outpatients received either placebo or one of three venlafaxine doses twice daily (b.i.d.) for up to 6 weeks. The total daily doses of venlafaxine were 25, 50-75, and 150-200 mg/day. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores at Week 6 were significantly lower for the high-dose group than for the placebo group. A positive dose-response trend for the primary efficacy parameters was demonstrated as early as Week 1. Venlafaxine was well tolerated at all dose levels. The most common side effects of clinical interest were nausea and dry mouth. The frequency of nausea in the venlafaxine groups was essentially the same (25-29%), whereas the frequencies of dry mouth, somnolence, and sweating were dose related. The results indicate that b.i.d. doses of venlafaxine are safe and effective in treating depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8290661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull        ISSN: 0048-5764


  16 in total

1.  Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.659

2.  Does differential drop-out explain the influence of study design on antidepressant response? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Dose-response relationship of duloxetine in placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Per Bech; Daniel K Kajdasz; Vibeke Porsdal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine in the treatment of primary dysthymia.

Authors:  A V Ravindran; Y Charbonneau; M D Zaharia; K al-Zaid; A Wiens; H Anisman
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 5.  Venlafaxine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in depression.

Authors:  S M Holliday; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Time course of clinical response to venlafaxine: relevance of plasma level and chirality.

Authors:  Marianne Gex-Fabry; Androniki E Balant-Gorgia; Luc P Balant; Serge Rudaz; Jean-Luc Veuthey; Gilles Bertschy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Timothy M Cooper; Amanda Persaud; Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Onset and time course of antidepressant action: psychopharmacological implications of a controlled trial of electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  R H Segman; B Shapira; M Gorfine; B Lerer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Is dose escalation of antidepressants a rational strategy after a medium-dose treatment has failed? A systematic review.

Authors:  Mazda Adli; Christopher Baethge; Andreas Heinz; Nicolas Langlitz; Michael Bauer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 5.760

10.  Dose-response relationship of recent antidepressants in the short-term treatment of depression.

Authors:  Patricia Berney
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.