Per Bech1, Daniel K Kajdasz, Vibeke Porsdal. 1. Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Dyrehavevej 48, DK-3400, Hilleroed, Denmark. pebe@fa.dk
Abstract
RATIONALE: The optimal dose for achieving the maximum antidepressive effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) remains a controversial issue. The varying sensitivity of scales that measure the severity of depression is one of the many factors affecting the evaluation of the dose-response relationship with antidepressants. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the 6-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D6) demonstrates a clearer association between dose and antidepressive effect compared with the 17-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D17) for fixed doses of duloxetine hydrochloride (40, 60, 80, and 120 mg daily) from six double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing safety and efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Mantel-Haenszel adjusted effect sizes were determined by dose for change from baseline to endpoint in HAM-D6 and HAM-D17 scores from the six studies. To confirm, assessments were repeated on the subset of the population corresponding to the 70% of patients with the longest duration of treatment regardless of study, treatment, dose, geography, or completion status. RESULTS: For the majority of assessments, HAM-D6 effect sizes were numerically larger than those estimated from the HAM-D17. Findings support that duloxetine 60 mg daily is the best effective dose. CONCLUSIONS: In this assessment of patients with MDD, the HAM-D6 was shown to be more sensitive compared with the HAM-D17 at detecting treatment effects. These findings are consistent with published results of other effective antidepressants.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: The optimal dose for achieving the maximum antidepressive effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) remains a controversial issue. The varying sensitivity of scales that measure the severity of depression is one of the many factors affecting the evaluation of the dose-response relationship with antidepressants. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the 6-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D6) demonstrates a clearer association between dose and antidepressive effect compared with the 17-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D17) for fixed doses of duloxetine hydrochloride (40, 60, 80, and 120 mg daily) from six double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing safety and efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Mantel-Haenszel adjusted effect sizes were determined by dose for change from baseline to endpoint in HAM-D6 and HAM-D17 scores from the six studies. To confirm, assessments were repeated on the subset of the population corresponding to the 70% of patients with the longest duration of treatment regardless of study, treatment, dose, geography, or completion status. RESULTS: For the majority of assessments, HAM-D6 effect sizes were numerically larger than those estimated from the HAM-D17. Findings support that duloxetine 60 mg daily is the best effective dose. CONCLUSIONS: In this assessment of patients with MDD, the HAM-D6 was shown to be more sensitive compared with the HAM-D17 at detecting treatment effects. These findings are consistent with published results of other effective antidepressants.
Authors: Michael J Detke; Curtis G Wiltse; Craig H Mallinckrodt; Robert K McNamara; Mark A Demitrack; Istvan Bitter Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Charles B Nemeroff; Alan F Schatzberg; David J Goldstein; Michael J Detke; Craig Mallinckrodt; Yili Lu; Pierre V Tran Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2002
Authors: Julio Bobes; Antonio Bulbena; Antonio Luque; Rafael Dal-Ré; Javier Ballesteros; Nora Ibarra Journal: Med Clin (Barc) Date: 2003-05-17 Impact factor: 1.725
Authors: L F Fabre; F S Abuzzahab; M Amin; J L Claghorn; J Mendels; W M Petrie; S Dubé; J G Small Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1995-11-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Arif Khan; Anjana Bose; George S Alexopoulos; Carl Gommoll; Dayong Li; Chetan Gandhi Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.859