Literature DB >> 8290328

The influence of spectral composition of complex tones and of musical experience on the perceptibility of virtual pitch.

A Preisler1.   

Abstract

A matching paradigm was used to evaluate the influence of the spectral characteristics number, relative height, and density of harmonics on the perceptibility of the missing fundamental. Fifty-eight musicians and 58 nonmusicians were instructed to adjust mistuned sinusoids to the subjectively perceived fundamental pitches of corresponding overtone spectra. Analyses of variance were used to compare the average of absolute and relative deviations of the tunings from the highest common divisors of the complex tones. The results indicate that musical experience is the most influential single factor determining the assessment of fundamental pitch. Nevertheless, all spectral parameters significantly affect tuning performance. Systematic relative deviations (stretching/compression effects) were observed for all considered variables. An increase of the optimum subjective distance between an overtone spectrum and its corresponding fundamental was characteristic of musicians and unambiguous spectra, whereas the compression effect was typical of nonmusicians and complex tones containing spectral gaps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8290328     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  27 in total

1.  Factors affecting pitch judgments as a function of spectral composition.

Authors:  E Terhardt; A Grubert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

2.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch and stimulus fine structure.

Authors:  F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Noise masking of a change in residue pitch.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evidence for neuronal periodicity detection in the auditory system of the Guinea fowl: implications for pitch analysis in the time domain.

Authors:  G Langner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  D K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  J Cynx; M Shapiro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Infant pitch perception: evidence for responding to pitch categories and the missing fundamental.

Authors:  M G Clarkson; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  [Why can we hear pure tones?].

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1989-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  [I can hear you, but I don't understand you. Why is it so important to perceive high frequencies?].

Authors:  A Cramer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Context sensitivity and invariance in perception of octave-ambiguous tones.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Jacqueline M Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-11-26

3.  Neurophysiological influence of musical training on speech perception.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-13

4.  Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Annemarie Seither-Preisler; Linda Johnson; Katrin Krumbholz; Andrea Nobbe; Roy Patterson; Stefan Seither; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.