Literature DB >> 8289652

Detecting phonemes and letters in text: interactions between different types and levels of processes.

V I Schneider1, A F Healy.   

Abstract

In six experiments, subjects detected phonemes or letters in text presented auditorily or visually. Experiments 1 and 2 provided support for the hypothesis that a mismatch between the phoneme and letter representations of a target leads to detection errors. In addition, visual word unitization processes were implicated. Experiments 3 and 4 provided support for the hypothesis that the Gestalt goodness of pattern affected detection errors when subjects searched for letters. Experiments 5 and 6 demonstrated that the effects of unitization on the detection of letters in common words were decreased by altering the familiar configuration of the test words. The combined results of all six experiments lead to the conclusion that both visual and phonetic processes influence letter detection, that these processes communicate through a type of cross-checking, and that there are at least two levels of visual (and perhaps of phonetic) processing involved in the letter detection task.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8289652     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

5.  Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory.

Authors:  U H Frauenfelder; J Segui; T Dijkstra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: font-specific, schematic tuning.

Authors:  T Sanocki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

8.  Font regularity constraints on the process of letter recognition.

Authors:  T Sanocki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Detection of Fs in a single statement: the role of phonetic recoding.

Authors:  J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

10.  Phonetic factors in letter detection: a reevaluation.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  The GO model: a reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Alice F Healy; Asher Koriat; Hamutal Kreiner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  Reading units that include interword spaces: filling spaces around a letter can facilitate letter detection.

Authors:  Alice F Healy; Thomas F Cunningham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

3.  Effects of grammatical categories on letter detection in continuous text.

Authors:  Denis Foucambert; Michael Zuniga
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-02

4.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-09

5.  The influence of multiple readings on the missing-letter effect revisited.

Authors:  Jean Saint-Aubin; Anie Roy-Charland; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.