Literature DB >> 8284376

MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens.

S F Quinn1, D A Franzini, T A Demlow, D R Rosencrantz, J Kim, R M Hanna, J Szumowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in staging prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively evaluated MR images obtained with an endorectal surface coil from 70 consecutive patients with known prostate cancer. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered to 40 patients. Multiple sequences were used, including conventional and fast spin echo, with and without fat suppression. The readers were blinded to the MR findings unless bone or nodal metastasis was present. MR images were compared with whole-mount sections.
RESULTS: The prospective staging accuracy for MR imaging was 51% (36 of 70 patients). Stage B disease was present in 27 patients (38%), stage C in 42 (60%), and stage D in one (1%). The retrospective staging accuracy was 67% (47 of 70 patients). Of the 42 patients with stage C disease, positive surgical margins were present in 36 (85%). Gadopentetate dimeglumine did not help detect or stage tumors.
CONCLUSION: Further studies must be performed to determine the role of endorectal coil MR imaging in the staging of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8284376     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.2.8284376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Endorectal coil MR imaging findings in hemospermia.

Authors:  R Lencioni; S Ortori; D Cioni; G Morelli; E Ceretti; M Cosottini; I Menchi; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Elizabeth M Genega; Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Martin P Smith; Herbert Y Kressel; Long Ngo; Martin G Sanda; William C Dewolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  C Bartolozzi; I Menchi; R Lencioni; S Serni; A Lapini; G Barbanti; A Bozza; A Amorosi; A Manganelli; M Carini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  [Innovative imaging in urology: fascination and future. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow].

Authors:  T Loch; G Schneider
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Marc R Engelbrecht; Gerrit J Jager; Robert P Hartman; Bernard F King; Christina A Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria: is it reasonable?

Authors:  Nicolas Girouin; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Alejandro Tonina Senes; Alvine Bissery; Muriel Rabilloud; Jean-Marie Maréchal; Marc Colombel; Denis Lyonnet; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Role of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in treatment of patients with prostate cancer and in determining radical prostatectomy surgical margin status: report of a single surgeon's practice.

Authors:  Jian Qing Zhang; Kevin R Loughlin; Kelly H Zou; Steven Haker; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 10.  Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Virendra Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.