Literature DB >> 8272901

Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs.

E L Shearer.   

Abstract

Cesarean section rates have risen dramatically in the U.S. over the past 20 years. Although infant mortality has declined during the same period, there is little evidence that more frequent cesarean surgery is the cause. Cesareans save lives or benefit health in certain circumstances, but the incidence of those indications has not increased. Cesarean section also has risks, the most significant for the infant being iatrogenic prematurity or respiratory disease. Maternal mortality is 2-4 times higher and morbidity is 5-10 times higher after a cesarean compared to vaginal birth. The four indications responsible for most of the rise in cesarean rates--previous cesarean, dystocia, breech presentation, and fetal distress--are those conferring the least clear-cut benefit. Demographically, women who are most likely to experience pregnancy complications, low birth weight births, or infant mortality are least likely to have a cesarean. Social, economic, and other factors seem to have a greater influence on the decision to perform a cesarean than does expected medical benefit. The development of neonatal intensive care, expanded access to prenatal care, and greater availability of abortion and family planning have contributed more to falling infant mortality. It has been estimated that approximately half the cesareans currently performed in the U.S. are medically unnecessary, resulting in considerable avoidable maternal mortality and morbidity, and a cost of over $1 billion each year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8272901     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90334-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

1.  Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study.

Authors:  J M Belizán; F Althabe; F C Barros; S Alexander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  Associations between perinatal interventions and hospital stillbirth rates and neonatal mortality.

Authors:  R Joyce; R Webb; J L Peacock
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12

4.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

5.  Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.

Authors:  Herng-Ching Lin; Sudha Xirasagar; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald E Iverson; Lois McCloskey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women's accounts in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Michelle A Kealy; Rhonda E Small; Pranee Liamputtong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Exercise during pregnancy and cesarean delivery: North Carolina PRAMS, 2004-2005.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Anna Maria Siega-Riz
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.

Authors:  Paola Colais; Maria P Fantini; Danilo Fusco; Elisa Carretta; Elisa Stivanello; Jacopo Lenzi; Giulia Pieri; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.

Authors:  Maria P Fantini; Elisa Stivanello; Brunella Frammartino; Anna P Barone; Danilo Fusco; Laura Dallolio; Paolo Cacciari; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.