Literature DB >> 8263431

Cavitation sounds during spinal manipulative treatments.

W Herzog1, Y T Zhang, P J Conway, G N Kawchuk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to confirm a practitioner's perception of cavitation during spinal manipulative therapy in a clinically relevant situation using accelerometer recordings.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
SETTING: Human Performance Laboratory and Sports Medicine Center, University of Calgary. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight patients from a single practitioner's patient pool who had pain in the area of the thoracic spine. INTERVENTION: Spinal manipulative treatment (SMT) on the transverse process of T4 using a reinforced unilateral contact and delivering a thrust in the posterior to anterior direction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Instantaneous acceleration signals obtained from the spinous process of T3 during SMT and the practitioner's perception if cavitation had occurred or not at the end of each treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that cavitation may be measured during SMT using accelerometry and that a practitioner's perception of the occurrence of cavitation during SMT is very accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8263431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  11 in total

1.  Effects of spinal manipulation on sensorimotor function in low back pain patients--A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine M Goertz; Ting Xia; Cynthia R Long; Robert D Vining; Katherine A Pohlman; James W DeVocht; Maruti R Gudavalli; Edward F Owens; William C Meeker; David G Wilder
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-08-08

2.  The relationship of the audible pop to hypoalgesia associated with high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: a secondary analysis of an experimental study in pain-free participants.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Does an audible release improve the outcome of a chiropractic adjustment?

Authors:  Mischa Bakker; Joyce Miller
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-09

4.  The influence of spinal manipulation on the practitioner-something to consider in our instruction of manual therapy?

Authors:  Dan Vaughn
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

5.  Real-time force feedback during flexion-distraction procedure for low back pain: A pilot study.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; James M Cox
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

6.  CAVITATION SOUNDS DURING CERVICOTHORACIC SPINAL MANIPULATION.

Authors:  James Dunning; Firas Mourad; Andrea Zingoni; Raffaele Iorio; Thomas Perreault; Noah Zacharko; César Fernández de Las Peñas; Raymond Butts; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

7.  Effect of sampling rates on the quantification of forces, durations, and rates of loading of simulated side posture high-velocity, low-amplitude lumbar spine manipulation.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; James DeVocht; Ali Tayh; Ting Xia
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure.

Authors:  Howard T Vernon; John J Triano; James K Ross; Steven K Tran; David M Soave; Maricelle D Dinulos
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Differences in force-time parameters and electromyographic characteristics of two high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulations following one another in quick succession.

Authors:  Lindsay M Gorrell; Philip J Conway; Walter Herzog
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-12-08

10.  Bilateral and multiple cavitation sounds during upper cervical thrust manipulation.

Authors:  James Dunning; Firas Mourad; Marco Barbero; Diego Leoni; Corrado Cescon; Raymond Butts
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.