Literature DB >> 8262844

Prospective comparison of in vitro normal cell radiosensitivity and normal tissue reactions in radiotherapy patients.

F B Geara1, L J Peters, K K Ang, J L Wike, W A Brock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This pilot study was undertaken to assess the relationship between in vitro radiosensitivity of different normal cell types and the type and severity of normal tissue reactions in individual patients after radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one patients with head and neck cancer were studied prospectively; four with head and neck and two with breast cancer were studied retrospectively. The retrospective cases were chosen because they exhibited unusual (severe or minimal) normal tissue reactions after radiotherapy. Small skin biopsies and blood samples were obtained and used to generate in vitro fibroblast and lymphocyte cultures, respectively. Clonogenic assays were used to measure in vitro fibroblast and lymphocyte radiosensitivity after high- and low-dose rate irradiation. Head and neck patients were treated by conventional, hyperfractionated, or concomitant boost regimens, which have been found to yield an equal probability of late normal tissue reactions. The highest dose received by each normal tissue in the target volume was estimated using computed tomography treatment plans. The median patient follow-up time was 19 months (range: 13-25).
RESULTS: The distributions of in vitro radiosensitivity parameters and the grade of tissue reaction scores in the patients showed a broad range between individuals. When in vitro parameters were compared to the acute and late tissue reactions, the radiosensitivity of fibroblasts, measured as surviving fraction at 2 Gy after high-dose rate irradiation, showed a highly significant correlation with the maximum grade of late effects (p < 0.0001 for the whole group and p = 0.0013 for the group of patients studied prospectively). No significant correlation was found between fibroblast radiosensitivity and maximum grade of acute effects or between lymphocyte radiosensitivity and either acute or late effects.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that individuals vary in normal cell radiosensitivity, and that in vitro measurements of fibroblast radiosensitivity may predict the magnitude of late normal tissue reactions after radiotherapy. These preliminary results, however, need to be validated in a larger group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8262844     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90540-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks misrepair is not compromized by broken DNA in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  G Alsbeih; W A Brock; N Terry; M D Story
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  [Genetic predisposition and radiation sensitivity of tumors].

Authors:  W Budach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity. Part II: implications for clinical practice and radiation protection.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Radiation-Induced Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Opportunities to Mitigate. Report of an NCI Workshop, September 19, 2016.

Authors:  Deborah E Citrin; Pataje G S Prasanna; Amanda J Walker; Michael L Freeman; Iris Eke; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Molykutty J Arankalayil; Eric P Cohen; Ruth C Wilkins; Mansoor M Ahmed; Mitchell S Anscher; Benjamin Movsas; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Marc S Mendonca; Thomas A Wynn; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  In vitro prediction of breast cancer therapy toxicity.

Authors:  Michael J McKay; Jezzie Maneerat; Timothy M McKay; Jeremy N McKay; Reza Masoud-Rahbari
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  Defining molecular and cellular responses after low and high linear energy transfer radiations to develop biomarkers of carcinogenic risk or therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  Michael Story; Liang-hao Ding; William A Brock; K Kian Ang; Ghazi Alsbeih; John Minna; Seongmi Park; Amit Das
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Radiation-induced oral mucositis in mice: strain differences.

Authors:  W Dörr; K Spekl; M Martin
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 8.  Radiogenomics: A systems biology approach to understanding genetic risk factors for radiotherapy toxicity?

Authors:  Carsten Herskind; Christopher J Talbot; Sarah L Kerns; Marlon R Veldwijk; Barry S Rosenstein; Catharine M L West
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Chromosomal in-vitro radiosensitivity of lymphocytes in radiotherapy patients and AT-homozygotes.

Authors:  J Dunst; S Neubauer; A Becker; E Gebhart
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Enhanced intrinsic radiosensitivity after treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery for an acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  Gerard Adams; Olga A Martin; Daniel E Roos; Pavel N Lobachevsky; Andrew E Potter; Andrew C Zacest; Eva Bezak; William M Bonner; Roger F Martin; Trevor Leong
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.