Literature DB >> 12139708

Radiation-induced oral mucositis in mice: strain differences.

W Dörr1, K Spekl, M Martin.   

Abstract

The present study was initiated to investigate strain differences in oral mucosal radiosensitivity in mice with regard to induction of clinically manifest ulceration. Mouse ventral tongue epithelium was used as an established animal model for radiobiological studies of radiation-induced mucositis. Mice from two different strains, C3H/Neu (n = 40) from the Dresden colony, and B6D2F1 (n = 50) from the Harlan/Winkelmann UK colony were subjected to irradiation of tongue mucosa. Graded single doses were applied to a 3 x 3 mm2 test field in the centre of the lower tongue with 25 kV X-rays in order to generate full dose-effect curves for acute mucosal ulceration, as a clinically relevant reaction. For both groups, dose-effect curves were computed by logit analysis; comparison of the curves was by maximum-likelihood chi2 test. In addition, the time course of ulceration, i.e. latent time and individual ulcer duration, was analysed. In both mouse strains, a well-defined dose effect was observed. The ED50 values, i.e. the doses at which ulceration is expected in 50% of the animals irradiated, and their standard deviation sigma, calculated by logit analysis, can be used to describe radiosensitivity. The ED50 was 11.0 +/- 3.4 Gy (95% confidence interval (7.2; 15.4), P for dose dependence: 0.014) and 13.4 +/- 3.6 Gy (95% confidence interval (10.6; 16.1), P for dose dependence: 0.0002) in C3H and BDF1 mice, respectively. Hence, oral mucosa in BDF1 mice was found to be marginally more radioresistant (P = 0.1). The latent time to ulceration, i.e. the time between irradiation and first diagnosis of ulcer, was 11.6 +/- 0.2 days (mean +/- SEM, n = 18) in C3H mice and 5.6 +/- 0.1 days (n = 27) in BDF1 mice (P = 0.0001). Both were independent of dose (PC3H = 0.94, PBDF1 = 0.33) and hence were calculated for all responding animals of the respective strain. Ulcer duration was 2.8 +/- 0.2 days and 2.4 +/- 0.1 days in C3H and B6 mice, respectively, and was also independent of dose (PC3H = 0.25, PBDF1 = 0.99), but was dependent on the mouse strain (P = 0.036). In conclusion, no statistically significant difference in oral mucosal radiosensitivity was observed between the mouse strains. This, however, may be attributed to the small number of animals used per dose group. The time course data, with a shorter latency and ulcer duration in BDF1 mice, are in good accordance with the higher proliferation rates reported for oral mucosa in this mouse strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12139708      PMCID: PMC6496504          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2184.35.s1.6.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Prolif        ISSN: 0960-7722            Impact factor:   6.831


  37 in total

1.  Changes in keratinocyte differentiation during accelerated repopulation of the irradiated mouse epidermis.

Authors:  K Liu; M Kasper; K R Trott
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 2.  How many human genetic disorders affect cellular radiosensitivity?

Authors:  J E Cleaver
Journal:  Cancer Cells       Date:  1989-12

3.  Effect of changing weekly dose on accelerated repopulation during fractionated irradiation of mouse tongue mucosa.

Authors:  W Dörr; M Weber-Frisch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Proliferation equivalent of 'accelerated repopulation' in mouse oral mucosa.

Authors:  W Dörr; H Emmendörfer; E Haide; J Kummermehr
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Relationship between in vitro chromosomal radiosensitivity of peripheral blood lymphocytes and the expression of normal tissue damage following radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  J B Barber; W Burrill; A R Spreadborough; E Levine; C Warren; A E Kiltie; S A Roberts; D Scott
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Acute changes in the bladder reservoir function after irradiation alone or in combination with chemotherapy: a matter of mouse strain.

Authors:  F Lundbeck; F A Stewart
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1989

7.  Evidence for two patterns of inheritance of sensitivity to induction of lung fibrosis in mice by radiation, one of which involves two genes.

Authors:  A J Franko; J Sharplin; W F Ward; J M Taylor
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Fibroblast radiosensitivity in vitro and lung fibrosis in vivo: comparison between a fibrosis-prone and fibrosis-resistant mouse strain.

Authors:  C L Dileto; E L Travis
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Short-term immobilization of mice by methohexitone.

Authors:  W Dörr; M Weber-Frisch
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Strain differences in the radiosensitivity of mouse spermatogonia.

Authors:  M Bianchi; J I Delic; G Hurtado-de-Catalfo; J H Hendry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1985-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Proteomic Biodosimetry Biomarkers Across Five Different Murine Strains.

Authors:  Mary Sproull; Uma Shankavaram; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Cell kinetic studies in murine ventral tongue epithelium: cell cycle progression studies using double labelling techniques.

Authors:  C S Potten; D Booth; N J Cragg; J A O'Shea; G L Tudor; C Booth
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Cell kinetic studies in the murine ventral tongue epithelium: thymidine metabolism studies and circadian rhythm determination.

Authors:  C S Potten; D Booth; N J Cragg; G L Tudor; J A O'Shea; D Appleton; D Barthel; T G Gerike; F A Meineke; M Loeffler; C Booth
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Reduced intensity conditioning and oral care measures prevent oral mucositis and reduces days of hospitalization in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Karin Garming Legert; Mats Remberger; Olle Ringdén; Anders Heimdahl; Göran Dahllöf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Systemic administration of heparin ameliorates radiation-induced oral mucositis-preclinical studies in mice.

Authors:  Maria Kowaliuk; Eva Bozsaky; Sylvia Gruber; Peter Kuess; Wolfgang Dörr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Guidelines for preclinical and early phase clinical assessment of novel radiosensitisers.

Authors:  K J Harrington; L J Billingham; T B Brunner; N G Burnet; C S Chan; P Hoskin; R I Mackay; T S Maughan; J Macdougall; W G McKenna; C M Nutting; A Oliver; R Plummer; I J Stratford; T Illidge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Single-Dose Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis Mouse Model.

Authors:  Osama Muhammad Maria; Alasdair Syme; Nicoletta Eliopoulos; Thierry Muanza
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.