Literature DB >> 23032890

Defining molecular and cellular responses after low and high linear energy transfer radiations to develop biomarkers of carcinogenic risk or therapeutic outcome.

Michael Story1, Liang-hao Ding, William A Brock, K Kian Ang, Ghazi Alsbeih, John Minna, Seongmi Park, Amit Das.   

Abstract

The variability in radiosensitivity across the human population is governed in part by genetic factors. The ability to predict therapeutic response, identify individuals at greatest risk for adverse clinical responses after therapeutic radiation doses, or identify individuals at high risk for carcinogenesis from environmental or medical radiation exposures has a medical and economic impact on both the individual and society at large. As radiotherapy incorporates particles, particularly particles larger than protons, into therapy, the need for such discriminators, (i.e., biomarkers) will become ever more important. Cellular assays for survival, DNA repair, or chromatid/chromosomal analysis have been used to identify at-risk individuals, but they are not clinically applicable. Newer approaches, such as genome-wide analysis of gene expression or single nucleotide polymorphisms and small copy number variations within chromosomes, are examples of technologies being applied to the discovery process. Gene expression analysis of primary or immortalized human cells suggests that there are distinct gene expression patterns associated with radiation exposure to both low and high linear energy transfer radiations and that those most radiosensitive are discernible by their basal gene expression patterns. However, because the genetic alterations that drive radio response may be subtle and cumulative, the need for large sample sizes of specific cell or tissue types is required. A systems biology approach will ultimately be necessary. Potential biomarkers from cell lines or animal models will require validation in a human setting where possible and before being considered as a credible biomarker some understanding of the molecular mechanism is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23032890      PMCID: PMC4492459          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182692085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  72 in total

1.  Analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks misrepair is not compromized by broken DNA in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  G Alsbeih; W A Brock; N Terry; M D Story
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Many amino acid substitution variants identified in DNA repair genes during human population screenings are predicted to impact protein function.

Authors:  Tong Xi; Irene M Jones; Harvey W Mohrenweiser
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome.

Authors:  A John Iafrate; Lars Feuk; Miguel N Rivera; Marc L Listewnik; Patricia K Donahoe; Ying Qi; Stephen W Scherer; Charles Lee
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Ataxia telangiectasia: a human mutation with abnormal radiation sensitivity.

Authors:  A M Taylor; D G Harnden; C F Arlett; S A Harcourt; A R Lehmann; S Stevens; B A Bridges
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Neutron carcinogenesis. Dose and dose-rate effects in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  R L Ullrich; M C Jernigan; J B Storer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Radiation reaction in ataxia telangiectasia.

Authors:  J L Morgan; T M Holcomb; R W Morrissey
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1968-11

7.  Malignant neoplasms in the families of patients with ataxia-telangiectasia.

Authors:  M Swift; L Sholman; M Perry; C Chase
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome.

Authors:  Jonathan Sebat; B Lakshmi; Jennifer Troge; Joan Alexander; Janet Young; Pär Lundin; Susanne Månér; Hillary Massa; Megan Walker; Maoyen Chi; Nicholas Navin; Robert Lucito; John Healy; James Hicks; Kenny Ye; Andrew Reiner; T Conrad Gilliam; Barbara Trask; Nick Patterson; Anders Zetterberg; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Chromosomal fragility syndrome and family history of radiosensitivity as indicators for radiotherapy dose modification.

Authors:  Ghazi Alsbeih; Michael D Story; Moshe H Maor; Fady B Geara; William A Brock
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 10.  A Ser49Cys variant in the ataxia telangiectasia, mutated, gene that is more common in patients with breast carcinoma compared with population controls.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; Michael M Weil; Cheryl L Ashorn; Eric A Strom; Alice Sigurdson; Melissa Bondy; Ranajit Chakraborty; James D Cox; Marsha D McNeese; Michael D Story
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  Summary: achievements, critical issues, and thoughts on the future.

Authors:  Kathryn D Held
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Donor-specific cell-based assays in studying sensitivity to low-dose radiation: a population-based perspective.

Authors:  Dora Il'yasova; Alexander Kinev; C David Melton; Faith G Davis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-11-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.