Literature DB >> 8259529

The educational philosophies behind the medical humanities programs in the United States: an empirical assessment of three different approaches to humanistic medical education.

D J Self1.   

Abstract

This study investigates the three major educational philosophies behind the medical humanities programs in the United States. It summarizes the characteristics of the Cultural Transmission Approach, the Affective Developmental Approach, and the Cognitive Developmental Approach. A questionnaire was sent to 415 teachers of medical humanities asking for their perceptions of the amount of time and effort devoted by their programs to these three philosophical approaches. The 234 responses constituted a 54.6% return. The approximately 80:20 gender ratio of males to females and other demographic data on age and educational background were consistent with other studies of the field of medical humanities. Reflections on the results in Table II indicate that some changes need to take place in the teaching of the medical humanities if the perceived ideal is to be achieved. In order for the current teachers of the medical humanities to think that the appropriate philosophies behind the teaching of the medical humanities are being implemented as they should be, much less time and effort need to be devoted to the Cultural Transmission Approach. With no other published reports on the educational philosophies behind the medical humanities programs, this study created a new knowledge base about this relatively young and rapidly emerging field.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach; Society for Health and Human Values

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8259529     DOI: 10.1007/bf00995164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med        ISSN: 0167-9902


  6 in total

1.  Professional liability (malpractice) coverage of humanist scholars functioning as clinical medical ethicists.

Authors:  D J Self; J D Skeel
Journal:  J Med Humanit Bioeth       Date:  1988 Fall-Winter

2.  Evaluation of teaching medical ethics by an assessment of moral reasoning.

Authors:  D J Self; D C Baldwin; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  The effect of teaching medical ethics on medical students' moral reasoning.

Authors:  D J Self; F D Wolinsky; D C Baldwin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  The pedagogy of two different approaches to humanistic medical education: cognitive vs affective.

Authors:  D J Self
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1988-06

5.  The influence of philosophical versus theological education on the moral development of clinical medical ethicists.

Authors:  D J Self; J D Skeel; N S Jecker
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  A description of humanist scholars functioning as ethicists in the clinical setting.

Authors:  J D Skeel; D J Self; R T Skeel
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.284

  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Teaching medical ethics: a review of the literature from North American medical schools with emphasis on education.

Authors:  D W Musick
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  1999

Review 2.  [Medical ethics teaching].

Authors:  Alena M Buyx; Bruce Maxwell; Holger Supper; Bettina Schöne-Seifert
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Seven Types of Ambiguity in Evaluating the Impact of Humanities Provision in Undergraduate Medicine Curricula.

Authors:  Alan Bleakley
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2015-12

4.  The Next Pandemic: Supporting COVID-19 Frontline Doctors Through Film Discussion.

Authors:  Cristelle Chow; Raveen Shahdadpuri; Kam Kai-Qian; Chan Yoke Hwee
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2020-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.