Literature DB >> 16985772

Selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy.

H Lepor.   

Abstract

Men with clinically localized prostate cancer and their physicians are faced with the management decision of radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or watchful waiting. Who is the best candidate for radical prostatectomy? Is cure the only relevant outcomes parameter? Does age make a difference? Are imaging studies necessary? This review provides answers, step-by-step, in the decision-making process.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID： 16985772      PMCID： PMC1476131     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN： 1523-6161


  29 in total

1.  The efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate in men with moderate symptoms of prostatism.

Authors:  H Lepor; G Rigaud
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Radical surgery versus radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  D F Paulson; G H Lin; W Hinshaw; S Stephani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Predicting radionuclide bone scan findings in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen is superior to all other clinical parameters.

Authors:  F M Chybowski; J J Keller; E J Bergstralh; J E Oesterling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Serum PSA after anatomic radical prostatectomy. The Johns Hopkins experience after 10 years.

Authors:  A W Partin; C R Pound; J Q Clemens; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and quality of life. Experience with 620 consecutive cases.

Authors:  P Leandri; G Rossignol; J R Gautier; J Ramon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor; J C Eggleston
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Frozen section detection of lymph node metastases in prostatic carcinoma: accuracy in grossly uninvolved pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.

Authors:  J I Epstein; J E Oesterling; J C Eggleston; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Molecular staging of prostate cancer with the use of an enhanced reverse transcriptase-PCR assay.

Authors:  A E Katz; C A Olsson; A J Raffo; C Cama; H Perlman; E Seaman; K M O'Toole; D McMahon; M C Benson; R Buttyan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence.

Authors:  M S Steiner; R A Morton; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450
View more
  6 in total

1.  Long-term costs and survival of prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Valentin Brodszky; Péter Varga; Judit Gimesi-Országh; Petra Fadgyas-Freyler; Imre Boncz; Péter Nyirády; Péter Riesz; Petra Baji; Márta Péntek; Fanni Rencz; László Gulácsi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

3.  A population-based study examining the influence of a specialized rapid-access cancer clinic on initial treatment choice in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Larissa J Vos; Clement K Ho; Bryan J Donnelly; J Dean Reuther; Marc Kerba
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Impact of statin use on overall and time to biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

Authors:  Linda My Huynh; Emily Keit; Aviva Atri Schuller; Raymond Ceja Carrillo; Erica Huang; Thomas E Ahlering; Shawna Boyle; Charles Enke; Michael J Baine
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Perioperative and continence outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy in elderly Indian men (≥70 years): A sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Narmada P Gupta; Emmanuel E Akpo; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  What is the consistency between the results of needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimen pathology results? A pilot study

Authors:  Ömer Ozan Yıldızlı; İbrahim Üntan; Deniz Demirci
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.