Literature DB >> 26505642

Research Needs for Understanding the Biology of Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening.

Sudhir Srivastava1, Brian J Reid2, Sharmistha Ghosh1, Barnett S Kramer1.   

Abstract

Many cancers offer an extended window of opportunity for early detection and therapeutic intervention that could lead to a reduction in cause-specific mortality. The pursuit of early detection in screening settings has resulted in decreased incidence and mortality for some cancers (e.g., colon and cervical cancers), and increased incidence with only modest or no effect on cause-specific mortality in others (e.g., breast and prostate). Whereas highly sensitive screening technologies are better at detecting a number of suspected "cancers" that are indolent and likely to remain clinically unimportant in the lifetime of a patient, defined as overdiagnosis, they often miss cancers that are aggressive and tend to present clinically between screenings, known as interval cancers. Unrecognized overdiagnosis leads to overtreatment with its attendant (often long-lasting) side effects, anxiety, and substantial financial harm. Existing methods often cannot differentiate indolent lesions from aggressive ones or understand the dynamics of neoplastic progression. To correctly identify the population that would benefit the most from screening and identify the lesions that would benefit most from treatment, the evolving genomic and molecular profiles of individual cancers during the clinical course of progression or indolence must be investigated, while taking into account an individual's genetic susceptibility, clinical and environmental risk factors, and the tumor microenvironment. Practical challenges lie not only in the lack of access to tissue specimens that are appropriate for the study of natural history, but also in the absence of targeted research strategies. This commentary summarizes the recommendations from a diverse group of scientists with expertise in basic biology, translational research, clinical research, statistics, and epidemiology and public health professionals convened to discuss research directions. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 1870-1875, 2016.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26505642      PMCID: PMC5811189          DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  51 in total

1.  Accurate reconstruction of the temporal order of mutations in neoplastic progression.

Authors:  Kathleen Sprouffske; John W Pepper; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 2.  Inflammasomes in carcinogenesis and anticancer immune responses.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Oliver Kepp; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 3.  The oviduct and ovarian cancer: causality, clinical implications, and "targeted prevention".

Authors:  Christopher P Crum; Frank D McKeon; Wa Xian
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Honor J Passow
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Stochastic fate of p53-mutant epidermal progenitor cells is tilted toward proliferation by UV B during preneoplasia.

Authors:  Allon M Klein; Douglas E Brash; Philip H Jones; Benjamin D Simons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study: design of a multi-institutional active surveillance cohort and biorepository.

Authors:  Lisa F Newcomb; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Ziding Feng; Martin E Gleave; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Mapping the hallmarks of lung adenocarcinoma with massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Marcin Imielinski; Alice H Berger; Peter S Hammerman; Bryan Hernandez; Trevor J Pugh; Eran Hodis; Jeonghee Cho; James Suh; Marzia Capelletti; Andrey Sivachenko; Carrie Sougnez; Daniel Auclair; Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Kristian Cibulskis; Kyusam Choi; Luc de Waal; Tanaz Sharifnia; Angela Brooks; Heidi Greulich; Shantanu Banerji; Thomas Zander; Danila Seidel; Frauke Leenders; Sascha Ansén; Corinna Ludwig; Walburga Engel-Riedel; Erich Stoelben; Jürgen Wolf; Chandra Goparju; Kristin Thompson; Wendy Winckler; David Kwiatkowski; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne; Vincent A Miller; William Pao; William D Travis; Harvey I Pass; Stacey B Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Roman K Thomas; Levi A Garraway; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  NSAIDs modulate CDKN2A, TP53, and DNA content risk for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Patricia C Galipeau; Xiaohong Li; Patricia L Blount; Carlo C Maley; Carissa A Sanchez; Robert D Odze; Kamran Ayub; Peter S Rabinovitch; Thomas L Vaughan; Brian J Reid
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11

10.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types.

Authors:  Cyriac Kandoth; Michael D McLellan; Fabio Vandin; Kai Ye; Beifang Niu; Charles Lu; Mingchao Xie; Qunyuan Zhang; Joshua F McMichael; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Mark D M Leiserson; Christopher A Miller; John S Welch; Matthew J Walter; Michael C Wendl; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Benjamin J Raphael; Li Ding
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  MicroRNA-433 targets AKT3 and inhibits cell proliferation and viability in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaolei Hu; Jie Wang; Wan He; Pan Zhao; Changsheng Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Risk Stratification System for Oral Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Lutécia H Mateus Pereira; Isildinha M Reis; Erika P Reategui; Claudia Gordon; Sandra Saint-Victor; Robert Duncan; Carmen Gomez; Stephanie Bayers; Penelope Fisher; Aymee Perez; W Jarrard Goodwin; Jennifer J Hu; Elizabeth J Franzmann
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 3.  Cancer overdiagnosis: a biological challenge and clinical dilemma.

Authors:  Sudhir Srivastava; Eugene J Koay; Alexander D Borowsky; Angelo M De Marzo; Sharmistha Ghosh; Paul D Wagner; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A Perspective.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-02-20

5.  Multi-omic cross-sectional cohort study of pre-malignant Barrett's esophagus reveals early structural variation and retrotransposon activity.

Authors:  A C Katz-Summercorn; S Jammula; A Frangou; I Peneva; M O'Donovan; M Tripathi; S Malhotra; M di Pietro; S Abbas; G Devonshire; W Januszewicz; A Blasko; K Nowicki-Osuch; S MacRae; A Northrop; A M Redmond; D C Wedge; R C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Gastric Xanthoma Is Related to the Rapid Growth of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ko Miura; Tadayuki Oshima; Akio Tamura; Ken Hara; Takuya Okugawa; Masashi Fukushima; Toshihiko Tomita; Hirokazu Fukui; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Low-Dose Mixture Hypothesis of Carcinogenesis Workshop: Scientific Underpinnings and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Mark F Miller; William H Goodson; Masoud H Manjili; Nicole Kleinstreuer; William H Bisson; Leroy Lowe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.