Literature DB >> 7885808

Contextual effects in difference judgments.

H N Schifferstein1.   

Abstract

Manipulating stimulus spacing, stimulus frequency, or stimulus range usually affects intensity judgments. In six experiments, I investigated the locus of analogues of these contextual effects in a "difference" estimation task. When all stimuli elicited the same taste quality, stimulus distribution affected the scale values only when water was included in the stimulus set (Experiments 1-3). When the subjective ranges of two taste qualities were manipulated, different scale values were obtained for the separate qualities in the two conditions (Experiment 4). Manipulation of the expected response distribution did not affect the scale values or the responses (Experiments 5-6). It is concluded that shifts in stimulus distributions or stimulus ranges result in shifts in subjective scale values. The contextual effects can be interpreted as relative shifts of a number of gustatory continua, with water lying on a separate continuum. Proposed is a model for context-dependent judgments, consisting of four stages: stimulus classification, stimulus placement, continuum placement, and continuum projection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7885808     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

2.  Sweetness does not habituate during a sip-and-spit experiment.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein; J E Frijters
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-02

3.  Ratio scale measurement of the perceived lengths of lines.

Authors:  S Parker; B Schneider; G Kanow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Remembrance of sounds past: memory and psychophysical scaling.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  "Ratio" and "difference" judgments for length, area, and volume: are there two classes of sensory continua?

Authors:  B Schneider; R Bissett
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Assessment of the taste interaction between two qualitatively similar-tasting substances: a comparison between comparison rules.

Authors:  C De Graaf; J E Frijters
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Context effects in judging taste intensity: a comparison of variable line and category rating methods.

Authors:  J A Stillman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10

8.  Loci of contextual effects in judgment.

Authors:  B A Mellers; M H Birnbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Stimulus range influences intensity and hedonic ratings of flavour.

Authors:  R L McBride
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Contextual effects in the perception of quinine HCl/NaCl mixtures.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.