Literature DB >> 8255698

Selective attention and temporal-order judgment.

P Jaśkowski1.   

Abstract

A procedure originally introduced by Sternberg and coworkers was used to examine the effect of selective attention on temporal-order judgment. Two-response and three-response paradigms were employed. As in Sternberg et al's work, a shift of psychometric functions for the two-response paradigm was found that suggested shorter latency for the stimulus to which attention was directed. However, no shift was noted for the three-response paradigm. This discrepancy can be explained by the assumption that the shift obtained for the two-response paradigm results from an artifact caused by a specific task. The artifact occurs because the instruction to attend to a particular stimulus induces a response bias when the subject is forced to guess in situations where he/she cannot recognize the temporal order of stimuli. The artifact disappears with the three-response paradigm where the subject has the additional option to respond "simultaneous".

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8255698     DOI: 10.1068/p220681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  16 in total

1.  Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

2.  Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: evidence for an attentional interpretation.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau; Odmar Neumann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

3.  Perceived timing of first- and second-order changes in vision and hearing.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Better late than never: how onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit.

Authors:  Larissa Vingilis-Jaremko; Susanne Ferber; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-07-24

5.  Visual prior entry for foreground figures.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lester; Lauren N Hecht; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

6.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Authors:  Lars T Boenke; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

Review 8.  Relative timing: from behaviour to neurons.

Authors:  S Mehdi Aghdaee; Lorella Battelli; John A Assad
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Temporal processes in prime-mask interaction: Assessing perceptual consequences of masked information.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

10.  Differential vertical visual latency as determined with a simultaneity paradigm.

Authors:  Shephali Patel; Steven H Schwartz; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.