Literature DB >> 8252666

Prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease. An investigation of differences in outcome between the sexes according to initial coronary disease presentation.

J M Murabito1, J C Evans, M G Larson, D Levy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differences exist between men and women in prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS AND
RESULTS: All Framingham Heart Study subjects with the onset of clinically apparent coronary disease from 1951 through 1986 were studied to compare prognosis in men and women according to CHD presentation. Coronary disease presentations included angina, coronary insufficiency (unstable angina), recognized myocardial infarction, unrecognized myocardial infarction, and coronary death. Less than 1% of subjects were lost to follow-up for overall mortality. Cox modeling was used to examine the sex differences in outcome for each coronary presentation. New nonfatal coronary disease developed in 750 men (mean age, 63 years) and 583 women (mean age, 67 years). After onset of angina, men were at greater risk than women for myocardial infarction (hazards ratio [HR], 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 3.34) and coronary death (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.36) after adjustment for age and coronary disease risk factors. After a recognized myocardial infarction, there was a trend toward greater risk for overall mortality in women than men after adjustment for age and risk factors (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.08). In contrast, after an unrecognized myocardial infarction, men were at increased risk for death compared with women (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Women fare at least as poorly as men after recognized myocardial infarction, whereas women have a more favorable outlook than men after the onset of angina or unrecognized myocardial infarction. The favorable outcome in women after angina and unrecognized myocardial infarction is due, in part, to greater misclassification of these coronary events in women than in men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8252666     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  36 in total

1.  The association of angina pectoris with heart disease mortality among men and women by diabetes status: the Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  Kimbach T Carpiuc; Deborah L Wingard; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  A population study of the long-term consequences of Rose angina: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew-Paisley study.

Authors:  N F Murphy; S Stewart; C L Hart; K MacIntyre; D Hole; J J V McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Cardiac CT Imaging of Plaque Vulnerability: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Tim Leiner; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Coronary artery calcium scoring, what is answered and what questions remain.

Authors:  George Youssef; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

5.  Are the economically active more deserving?

Authors:  B Gaffney; F Kee
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-04

6.  Use of coronary artery calcium testing to guide aspirin utilization for primary prevention: estimates from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Michael D Miedema; Daniel A Duprez; Jeffrey R Misialek; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir; Michael G Silverman; Ron Blankstein; Matthew J Budoff; Philip Greenland; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-05-06

Review 7.  Angina (chronic stable).

Authors:  Laurence O'Toole
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-10-01

8.  Coronary computed tomography angiography for screening of an asymptomatic population: too much or too soon?

Authors:  Seong-Mi Park
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Good judgement or sex bias in the referral of patients for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? An exploratory study.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; P M Slaughter; R S Baigrie; C D Morgan; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Coronary Artery Disease in an Asymptomatic Population Undergoing a Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Ghassan Zaid; Dana Yehudai; Uri Rosenschein; Abdel-Rauf Zeina
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2010-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.