Literature DB >> 7697580

Good judgement or sex bias in the referral of patients for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? An exploratory study.

S B Jaglal1, P M Slaughter, R S Baigrie, C D Morgan, C D Naylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the sex-specific prevalence of referral to a cardiologist for noninvasive ischemic testing (NIIT) or angiography among outpatients with clinical suspicion of new coronary artery disease (CAD).
DESIGN: Retrospective records-based cohort study.
SETTING: Group cardiology referral practice in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Toronto. PATIENTS: Of 1212 new patients referred between Mar. 1, 1991, and Mar. 31, 1993, 339 (232 men and 107 women) had symptoms of CAD and had initiation or modification of antianginal therapy, or were prescribed NIIT or angiography by their cardiologist. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of prior NIIT and of subsequent diagnostic procedures for women and men.
RESULTS: Women were less likely than men to have had prior NIIT (51 [47.7%] v. 162 [69.8%]) (p < 0.001). Women with class I or II angina were less likely than their male counterparts to have had prior NIIT (20/40 [50.0%] v. 84/109 [77.1%]) (p = 0.001); a similar difference was found between women and men with class III or IV angina (5/15 [33.3%] v. 43/60 [71.7%]) (p = 0.006). Men and women with atypical angina were equally likely to have had prior NIIT. Among patients with a positive initial NIIT result a higher proportion of women than of men did not have any further testing done by the cardiologist (53.5% v. 33.7%) (p = 0.02). Cardiologists referred a higher proportion of women (40.2%) than of men (25.4%) for NIIT (p = 0.006) and, for patients with a positive prior NIIT result, were also more likely to refer women (25.7% [9/43]) than men (12.0% [16/133]) for further NIIT (p = 0.04). Women with a positive prior NIIT result were more likely than their male counterparts to have a negative retest result (42.8% v. 18.2%). After adjustment for age, anginal class and overall result of NIIT, women were less likely than men to be referred for angiography (odds ratio 1.4), although the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study sex-related differences in patterns of use of NIIT by cardiologists seem largely based on differences in testing before referral by family physicians and general internists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7697580      PMCID: PMC1337760     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  16 in total

1.  Letter: Grading of angina pectoris.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Differences between men and women in hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

Authors:  G T O'Connor; J R Morton; M J Diehl; E M Olmstead; L H Coffin; D G Levy; C T Maloney; S K Plume; W Nugent; D J Malenka
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).

Authors:  L D Fisher; J W Kennedy; K B Davis; C Maynard; J K Fritz; G Kaiser; W O Myers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Placing patients in the queue for coronary surgery: do age and work status alter Canadian specialists' decisions?

Authors:  C D Naylor; C M Levinton; R S Baigrie; B S Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Sex differences in the use of invasive coronary procedures in Ontario.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; V Goel; C D Naylor
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Effect of gender on long-term outcome of angina pectoris and myocardial infarction/sudden unexpected death.

Authors:  A Orencia; K Bailey; B P Yawn; T E Kottke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men: analyses of risks and long-term results.

Authors:  F D Loop; L R Golding; J P MacMillan; D M Cosgrove; B W Lytle; W C Sheldon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  J N Tobin; S Wassertheil-Smoller; J P Wexler; R M Steingart; N Budner; L Lense; J Wachspress
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  D B Mark; L K Shaw; E R DeLong; R M Califf; D B Pryor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L J Shaw; D D Miller; J C Romeis; D Kargl; L T Younis; B R Chaitman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  The association of angina pectoris with heart disease mortality among men and women by diabetes status: the Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  Kimbach T Carpiuc; Deborah L Wingard; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  M W Morgan; R B Deber; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; P Gladstone; R J Cusimano; K O'Rourke; G Tomlinson; A S Detsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.