Literature DB >> 8252066

RNA editing in maize chloroplasts is a processing step independent of splicing and cleavage to monocistronic mRNAs.

R Freyer1, B Hoch, K Neckermann, R M Maier, H Kössel.   

Abstract

The psbB operon contained in the plastomes of higher plants consists of the genes psbB, psbH, petB and petD. The primary transcript of this operon is subject to a series of processing steps which include cleavages resulting in four monocistronic mRNAs and splicing of the petB and petD transcripts. A search for editing sites within the two latter transcripts from maize led us to the detection of one editing site within the petB coding region which is conserved at the DNA level in other graminean species and in tobacco. This shows that editing must be considered as an additional processing step of the psbB operon encoded primary transcript. As is evident from cDNA sequences derived from the dicistronic and/or unspliced petB/D transcripts which are completely edited, editing is an early step of mRNA processing which precedes both splicing and cleavage to the monocistronic mRNAs and which must, therefore, be independent of the latter two steps. This conclusion is confirmed by a similar observation with the editing site of the rpl2 transcript which is contained in the polycistronic transcript of the rpoA operon, although here only partial editing is observed for the unspliced dicistronic rpl23/rpl2 transcript.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8252066     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04040621.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  32 in total

1.  Transcripts of the ndhH-D operon of barley plastids: possible role of unedited site III in splicing of the ndhA intron.

Authors:  E M del Campo; B Sabater; M Martín
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Surprising features of plastid ndhD transcripts: addition of non-encoded nucleotides and polysome association of mRNAs with an unedited start codon.

Authors:  Aitor Zandueta-Criado; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Recognition of RNA editing sites is directed by unique proteins in chloroplasts: biochemical identification of cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in RNA editing in tobacco and pea chloroplasts.

Authors:  Tetsuya Miyamoto; Junichi Obokata; Masahiro Sugiura
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  RNA editing in ribosome-less plastids of iojap maize.

Authors:  Christine P Halter; Nemo M Peeters; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 5.  Function of chloroplast RNA-binding proteins.

Authors:  Jessica Jacobs; Ulrich Kück
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Complete RNA editing of unspliced and dicistronic transcripts of the intron-containing reading frame IRF170 from maize chloroplasts.

Authors:  S Ruf; P Zeltz; H Kössel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mutations of cytochrome b6 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii disclose the functional significance for a proline to leucine conversion by petB editing in maize and tobacco.

Authors:  F Zito; R Kuras; Y Choquet; H Kössel; F A Wollman
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Site-selective inhibition of plastid RNA editing by heat shock and antibiotics: a role for plastid translation in RNA editing.

Authors:  D Karcher; R Bock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Sequences directing C to U editing of the plastid psbL mRNA are located within a 22 nucleotide segment spanning the editing site.

Authors:  S Chaudhuri; P Maliga
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Creation of a novel protein-coding region at the RNA level in black pine chloroplasts: the pattern of RNA editing in the gymnosperm chloroplast is different from that in angiosperms.

Authors:  T Wakasugi; T Hirose; M Horihata; T Tsudzuki; H Kössel; M Sugiura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.