Literature DB >> 8249930

Long-term stability and prediction of soft tissue changes after LeFort I surgery.

G A Hack1, J J de Mol van Otterloo, R Nanda.   

Abstract

Many evaluations of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery have been undertaken, and many correlations of soft tissue to hard tissue movements have been established. These studies have not, however, specifically discussed the long-term stability or characteristics of the soft tissue changes. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the long term stability of soft tissue changes 5 years after LeFort I osteotomy, (2) to determine reliable correlations, if any, of soft tissue changes to bony movements effected in surgery, and (3) to determine the predictability of soft tissue changes as an aid to orthodontic treatment planning. Cephalometric data from 25 patients who were treated with LeFort I osteotomy with or without a concurrent mandibular procedure were analyzed retrospectively. Cases were selected from the patient records of the Department of Oral Surgery of the Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. These patients were followed up at four time points, the last being a mean of 6.1 years after surgery. Analysis of stability data revealed that most horizontal and vertical soft tissue change after LeFort I surgery occurred in the first year after surgery. Significant (> 10%) change continued to occur for subnasale, labrale inferius, upper lip protrusion, lower lip protrusion, and soft tissue convexity during the subsequent 5 years. Hard tissue to soft tissue correlations were calculated and ratios of soft tissue to hard tissue movement were determined for appropriate hard and soft tissue landmarks at four time intervals. Reliable correlations of hard tissue change at surgery to 5-year soft tissue change could be made for 10 variables, which was considerably less frequently than for 1-year soft tissue change. The relatively low reliability of long-term prediction correlations suggests that soft tissue movements may be more independent of hard tissue over time. One-year prediction values were similar to 5-year values and thus could be used for prediction purposes in orthodontic treatment planning. Most short-term hard to soft tissue correlations found in the present study were in the range of those established by previous authors. Long-term hard tissue to soft tissue correlations gave higher ratios of soft tissue movement secondary to maxillary surgery, approaching ratios of 1.0:1.0 for some variables. This finding, as well as the long-term stability data, suggest that soft tissue settling or equilibrium after surgery may take several years to complete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8249930     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(05)80438-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].

Authors:  X J Wang; Y M Zhang; Y H Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

2.  Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.

Authors:  E Erin Bilbo; Steven D Marshall; Karin A Southard; Verrasathpurush Allareddy; Nathan Holton; Allyn M Thames; Marlene S Otsby; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Soft-tissue changes in association with anterior maxillary osteotomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mariko Okudaira; Tatsuo Kawamoto; Takashi Ono; Keiji Moriyama
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07-16

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of changes of the malar-midfacial region after LeFort I osteotomy and maxillary advancement.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Eleftherios Vairaktaris; Manuel Kramer; Andreas Schlegel; Alexandra Holst; Ursula Hirschfelder; Jörg Wiltfang; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam; Marc Stamminger
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05

5.  Soft Tissue Changes Following Combined Anterior Segmental Bimaxillary Orthognathic Procedures.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Bhagat; Sankar Kannan; M R Ramesh Babu; Thiru Murugan Kanagasabapathy; Manoj Kumar Jain; C Ramesh; Anu Radha
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-03-16

6.  Assessment of maxillary position. Implant vs cephalometric methods.

Authors:  Panisha Verayannont; Urban Hägg; Ricky W K Wong; Colman McGrath; Shadow Yeung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Constancy of the angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the sella-nasion line: a nine-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Young Jae Huh; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Hong-Kyun Kim; Shin-Eun Nam; Hye Yoon Song; Joo-Hoon Lee; Young-Seok Park
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Soft tissue response after Class III bimaxillary surgery.

Authors:  Gundega Jakobsone; Arild Stenvik; Lisen Espeland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Class III Malocclusion Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment.

Authors:  Bruna Alves Furquim; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Guilherme Janson; Luis Fernando Simoneti; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Daniel Salvatore de Freitas
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-11-06

10.  Understanding Predictability Error in Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Edlyn Rodrigues; Vikas Dhupar; Francis Akkara
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.