Literature DB >> 31371893

Understanding Predictability Error in Orthognathic Surgery.

Edlyn Rodrigues1, Vikas Dhupar1, Francis Akkara1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Orthognathic surgery aims to improve the facial aesthetics while maintaining stable jaw form and function. Lateral cephalometry provides objective data used in pre-op mock surgery to predict movement of the maxilla and mandible during orthognathic procedures. PATIENT AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 30 adult orthognathic surgery patients. Mock jaw surgery predicted two-dimensional (horizontal and vertical) linear movement of maxilla and mandible. Operative procedures performed were bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy. Seven-day pre-op cephalogram (T1) was compared to 7th day post-op cephalogram (T2) to assess hard tissue movement of point A (maxilla) and point B (mandible) using Cartesian (X-Y) plane.
RESULTS: The difference between predicted values to the 7th day post-op outcome results was statistically insignificant (p value less than 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Planning in orthognathic surgery using digitized two-dimensional cephalometric tracings and mock jaw surgery produces predictable results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bijaw surgery; Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; Hard tissue analysis; Lateral cephalometry; Le Fort I osteotomy; Predictability error

Year:  2019        PMID: 31371893      PMCID: PMC6639472          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-018-01181-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  12 in total

1.  Who needs surgical-orthodontic treatment?

Authors:  W R Proffit; R P White
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1990

2.  Evaluation of soft tissue profile following intraoral ramus osteotomy in Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  K K Lew; F C Loh; J F Yeo; H S Loh
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1990

3.  Predictability of maxillary repositioning during bimaxillary surgery: accuracy of a new technique.

Authors:  J N Gil; J D P Claus; R Manfro; S M Lima
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Scope and limitations of orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  D Barnard; D Birnie
Journal:  Dent Update       Date:  1990-03

5.  Reliability of bimaxillary surgical planning with the 3-D orthognathic surgery simulator.

Authors:  G R Csaszar; H Niederdellmann
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2000

6.  Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Carla Maria Melleiro Gimenez; Francisco Antonio Bertoz; Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli; Oswaldo Magro Filho; Idelmo Garcia; Valfrido Antonio Pereira Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

7.  Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  O A Pospisil
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Accuracy of cephalometric prediction in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  H Friede; K E Kahnberg; R Adell; A Ridell
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  H L Legan; C J Burstone
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1980-10

10.  Patients' expectations as predictors of orthognathic surgery outcomes.

Authors:  H A Kiyak; P P Vitaliano; J Crinean
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.