Literature DB >> 18600355

Three-dimensional analysis of changes of the malar-midfacial region after LeFort I osteotomy and maxillary advancement.

Emeka Nkenke1, Eleftherios Vairaktaris, Manuel Kramer, Andreas Schlegel, Alexandra Holst, Ursula Hirschfelder, Jörg Wiltfang, Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam, Marc Stamminger.   

Abstract

AIM: It has been the objective of the present prospective study to assess visible volume changes of the facial soft tissue after LeFort I osteotomy with advancement and to determine the soft-tissue-to-hard-tissue ratios of advancement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty adult patients (ten female, ten male, mean age 33.9 +/- 14.9 years) received a LeFort I osteotomy with advancement because of a maxillary protrusion. Lateral skull radiographs and optical three-dimensional (3D) scans of the facial surface were assessed preoperatively and 12 months after surgery. The lateral skull radiographs were used to carry out standard linear and angular cephalometric measurements. The pre- and postoperative optical 3D surface scans were registered. A well-defined area in the malar region was used to determine the visible volume changes for each side separately. The mean accommodation vector that transforms the preoperative into the postoperative surface was assessed for each facial half separately. The soft-tissue-to-hard-tissue ratios between the incision superius and the labrale superius, the maximal parasagittal advancement of soft tissue, and the accommodation vectors were calculated.
RESULTS: A mean advancement of the incision superius of 5.3 +/- 2.1 mm was accompanied by a volume increase of 5.2 +/- 4.1 cm(3) in the right malar-midfacial region and 4.6 +/- 4.7 cm(3) on the left side, respectively, revealing a symmetrical volume change (p = 0.370). The soft-tissue-to-hard-tissue ratios were 80 +/- 94% for labrale superius and incision superius, 56 +/- 79% (right) and 51 +/- 56% (left) for accommodation vector and incision superius and 97 +/- 79% (right) and 98 +/- 89% (left) for maximal parasagittal advancement of soft tissue and incision superius. DISCUSSION: The determination of volume changes and accompanying accommodation vectors complete the cephalometric analysis during the follow-up of patients undergoing LeFort I osteotomy. The data show that maxillary advancement leads to a more pronounced shifting of the soft tissues in the malar-midfacial area than of the upper lip. The new parameters will help to assess normative soft tissue data based on 3D imaging with a view to an improved three-dimensional prediction of the operative outcome of orthognathic surgery away from the midline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18600355     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-008-0094-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  32 in total

1.  Malar implants for improvement of the facial appearance.

Authors:  U T Hinderer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  E Nkenke; S Zachow; M Benz; T Maier; K Veit; M Kramer; S Benz; G Häusler; F Wilhelm Neukam; M Lell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Three-dimensional analysis techniques--Part 3: Color-coded system for three-dimensional measurement of bone and ratio of soft tissue to bone: the analysis.

Authors:  A M McCance; J P Moss; W R Fright; A D Linney
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1997-01

4.  Building out the malar prominences as an addition to rhytidectomy.

Authors:  M González-Ulloa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Autogenous mandibular bone grafts for malar augmentation.

Authors:  J Jensen; O Reiche-Fischel; S Sindet-Pedersen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Morphologic changes in the perioral soft tissues in patients with mandibular hyperplasia using a laser system for three-dimensional surface measurement.

Authors:  N Motegi; S Tsutsumi; H Okumura; Y Yokoe; T Iizuka
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Quadrangular Le Fort I osteotomy: surgical technique and review of 54 patients.

Authors:  E E Keller; A H Sather
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of fifteen patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions after bimaxillary surgery.

Authors:  J P Moss; A M McCance; W R Fright; A D Linney; D R James
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 9.  Soft tissue response to orthognathic surgery in persons with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  M Ewing; R B Ross
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1993-05

10.  Malar augmentation with silicone implants.

Authors:  E J Ivy; Z P Lorenc; S J Aston
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  14 in total

1.  3D soft tissue analysis--part 2: vertical parameters.

Authors:  Janka Kochel; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Michael Kochel; Susanne Schneck; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Facial biometrics of peri-oral changes in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  L Zou; O K Adegun; A Willis; Farida Fortune
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance.

Authors:  P Meyer-Marcotty; J Kochel; U Richter; F Richter; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Development of a simulation system in mandibular orthognathic surgery based on integrated three-dimensional data.

Authors:  Yoshihide Mori; Hidetaka Shimizu; Katsuhiro Minami; Tae-Geon Kwon; Takamitsu Mano
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-10-28

5.  3D soft tissue analysis--part 1: sagittal parameters.

Authors:  Janka Kochel; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Friederike Strnad; Michael Kochel; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Midfacial soft tissue changes after leveling Le Fort I osteotomy with differential reduction. Cone-beam computed tomography volume superimposition.

Authors:  Dae-Seok Hwang; Yong-Il Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Jae-Yeol Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Three-dimensional investigation of facial surface asymmetries in skeletal malocclusion patients before and after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  M Blockhaus; J Kochel; J Hartmann; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer; P Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Soft tissue response in orthognathic surgery patients treated by bimaxillary osteotomy: cephalometry compared with 2-D photogrammetry.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Alice Martin
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-05

9.  The Prediction Capacity 3-D Software, on a 2-D Analysis, in Planning the Positioning of the Upper Lip After Maxillary Advancement.

Authors:  Letícia Liana Chihara; Jéssica de Fátima Segantin; Paulo Esteves Pinto Faria; Eduardo Sant'Ana; Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro; Renato Luiz Maia Nogueira; Osny Ferreira-Júnior
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-02-20

10.  Correlation Assessment between Three-Dimensional Facial Soft Tissue Scan and Lateral Cephalometric Radiography in Orthodontic Diagnosis.

Authors:  Piero Antonio Zecca; Rosamaria Fastuca; Matteo Beretta; Alberto Caprioglio; Aldo Macchi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.