Literature DB >> 8247814

Effectiveness of pH measurements in predicting feeding tube placement: an update.

N Metheny1, L Reed, L Wiersema, M McSweeney, M A Wehrle, J Clark.   

Abstract

This paper reports further findings from an ongoing clinical study designed to evaluate the extent to which pH values of aspirates from feeding tubes can be used to differentiate between gastric and intestinal tube placement and gastric and respiratory tube placement. The sample consisted of 405 aspirates from small-bore nasogastric tubes and 389 aspirates from nasointestinal tubes, which were obtained from 605 subjects ranging in age from 18 to 94 years. Data were collected at the time of initial placement and again, when possible, after feedings were initiated. A total of 794 pH-meter readings were made concurrently with X-rays to determine feeding tube position. Gastric placement was successfully distinguished from intestinal placement of the feeding tubes on the basis of pH-meter readings (p < .0001). Approximately 85% of the 405 pH-meter readings from gastric fluid were between 0 and 6.0, while over 87% of the 389 pH-meter measurements performed on intestinal aspirates were greater than 6.0. Four aspirates from feeding tubes inadvertently placed in the respiratory tract (two in the pleural space and two in the tracheobronchial tree) were tested with a pH-meter, all had pH values greater than 6.5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8247814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

1.  Gastric tube placement in young children.

Authors:  Marsha L Cirgin Ellett; Joseph M B Croffie; Mervyn D Cohen; Susan M Perkins
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.075

2.  Comparing bedside methods of determining placement of gastric tubes in children.

Authors:  Marsha L Cirgin Ellett; Mervyn D Cohen; Joseph M B Croffie; Kathleen A Lane; Joan K Austin; Susan M Perkins
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.260

3.  Nasogastric tube in mechanical ventilated patients: ETCO2 and pH measuring to confirm correct placement. A pilot study.

Authors:  Samuele Ceruti; Simone Dell'Era; Francesco Ruggiero; Giovanni Bona; Andrea Glotta; Maira Biggiogero; Edoardo Tasciotti; Christoph Kronenberg; Gianluca Lollo; Andrea Saporito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  The effectiveness of ultrasonography in verifying the placement of a nasogastric tube in patients with low consciousness at an emergency center.

Authors:  Hyung Min Kim; Byung Hak So; Won Jung Jeong; Se Min Choi; Kyu Nam Park
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Validation of the RightSpot™ device for determination of gastric pH during nasogastric tube placement.

Authors:  Charles R Lambert; David Varlotta; Marjorie Posey; Jadie L Heberlein; Janice M Shirley
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-17

6.  Potential risk of malposition of nasogastric tube using nose-ear-xiphoid measurement.

Authors:  Yen-Chun Chen; Lien-Yen Wang; Yu-Jun Chang; Chao-Pin Yang; Tsung-Ju Wu; Fung-Ru Lin; Sen-Yung Liu; Ta-Sen Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Selecting pH cut-offs for the safe verification of nasogastric feeding tube placement: a decision analytical modelling approach.

Authors:  Melody Zhifang Ni; Jeremy R Huddy; Oliver H Priest; Sisse Olsen; Lawrence D Phillips; Patrick M M Bossuyt; George B Hanna
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.