Literature DB >> 15995153

Gastric tube placement in young children.

Marsha L Cirgin Ellett1, Joseph M B Croffie, Mervyn D Cohen, Susan M Perkins.   

Abstract

In this study, the internal position of a nasogastric/orogastric tube was determined in 72 children, prior to an abdominal radiograph, by measuring CO2 and pH and bilirubin of tube aspirate. Fifteen of the 72 tubes (20.8%) were incorrectly placed on radiograph. Using the suggested adult cutoff of pH 5, pH of aspirate correctly predicted misplacement outside the stomach in 7/28 (25%) of children and correctly predicted correct placement in the stomach in 34 of 40 children (85%). Using the suggested adult cutoff of bilirubin > or = 5 mg/dL, bilirubin monitoring failed to identify either of two incorrectly placed tubes. In this study, using an algorithm of assuming stomach placement if the pH of aspirate is < or = 5 and obtaining an abdominal radiograph when either no aspirate is obtained or the pH is >5 would have resulted in 92% accuracy. Alternatively, obtaining an abdominal radiograph would result in nearly 100% accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995153      PMCID: PMC1592291          DOI: 10.1177/1054773805275121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nurs Res        ISSN: 1054-7738            Impact factor:   2.075


  20 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the auscultatory method in predicting feeding tube location.

Authors:  N Metheny; M McSweeney; M A Wehrle; L Wiersema
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  A survey of gastric tube practices in level II and level III nurseries.

Authors:  S Y Shiao; T E DiFiore
Journal:  Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep

3.  Frequency of nasoenteral tube displacement and associated risk factors.

Authors:  N A Metheny; M Spies; P Eisenberg
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Pulmonary complications from nasoenteral feeding tube insertion in an intensive care unit: incidence and prevention.

Authors:  M R Harris; J S Huseby
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Effectiveness of pH measurements in predicting feeding tube placement: an update.

Authors:  N Metheny; L Reed; L Wiersema; M McSweeney; M A Wehrle; J Clark
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  Minimizing respiratory complications of nasoenteric tube feedings: state of the science.

Authors:  N Metheny
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Hold that x-ray: aspirate pH and auscultation prove enteral tube placement.

Authors:  M J Neumann; C T Meyer; J L Dutton; R Smith
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Pneumothorax as a complication of placement of a nasoenteric tube.

Authors:  J M Aronchick; D M Epstein; W B Gefter; W T Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Transbronchial intubation of the right pleural space: a rare complication of nasogastric intubation with a polyvinylchloride tube--a case study.

Authors:  A el-Gamel; D C Watson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.210

10.  Mycosis fungoides presenting as ARDS and diagnosed by bronchoalveolar lavage. Radiographic and pathologic pulmonary manifestations.

Authors:  K S Miller; S A Sahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  9 in total

1.  Predicting the insertion length for gastric tube placement in neonates.

Authors:  Marsha L Cirgin Ellett; Mervyn D Cohen; Susan M Perkins; Coral E Smith; Kathleen A Lane; Joan K Austin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2011-06-03

2.  Reconstruction of a full-thickness alar wound using an auricular conchal composite graft.

Authors:  Marco Klinger; Luca Maione; Federico Villani; Fabio Caviggioli; Davide Forcellini; Francesco Klinger
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Naso-enteric Tube Placement: A Review of Methods to Confirm Tip Location, Global Applicability and Requirements.

Authors:  S A Milsom; J A Sweeting; H Sheahan; E Haemmerle; J A Windsor
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparing bedside methods of determining placement of gastric tubes in children.

Authors:  Marsha L Cirgin Ellett; Mervyn D Cohen; Joseph M B Croffie; Kathleen A Lane; Joan K Austin; Susan M Perkins
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.260

Review 5.  Procedures for measuring and verifying gastric tube placement in newborns: an integrative review.

Authors:  Flávia de Souza Barbosa Dias; Suellen Cristina Dias Emidio; Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes; Antonieta Keiko Kakuda Shimo; Ana Raquel Medeiros Beck; Elenice Valentim Carmona
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-07-10

6.  Anterior Superior Iliac Spine to the Tibial Tuberosity Length: An Easier, Accurate, and Faster Method for Predicting Orogastric Tube Length in Neonates-An Observational Study.

Authors:  Samarendra Mahapatro; Satish Mohanty; Sandeep Kumar Panigrahi; Rajib Kumar Ray; Shruti Saraswat
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2017-03-30

7.  Bedside ultrasonography for the confirmation of gastric tube placement in the neonate.

Authors:  Yunus Oktay Atalay; Ahmet Veysel Polat; Elif Ozyazici Ozkan; Leman Tomak; Canan Aygun; Joseph Drew Tobias
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

8.  Use of pH reagent strips to verify gastric tube placement in newborns.

Authors:  Flávia de Souza Barbosa Dias; Beatriz Pera de Almeida; Beatriz Regina Alvares; Rodrigo Menezes Jales; Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas; Elenice Valentim Carmona
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2019-12-05

9.  Verifying the placement and length of feeding tubes in canine and feline neonates.

Authors:  Etienne Furthner; Mariusz Paweł Kowalewski; Paul Torgerson; Iris Margaret Reichler
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.741

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.