Literature DB >> 8246021

Carboplatin pharmacokinetics in children: the development of a pediatric dosing formula. The United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group.

D R Newell1, A D Pearson, K Balmanno, L Price, R A Wyllie, M Keir, A H Calvert, I J Lewis, C R Pinkerton, M C Stevens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin in children and use the data to develop a pediatric dose formula. It was anticipated that renal function would be a major determinant of carboplatin disposition and the relationship between carboplatin clearance and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was examined in detail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma carboplatin pharmacokinetics were measured as ultrafiltrable platinum in 22 patients (5 to 63 kg) following 200 to 1,000 mg/m2 of carboplatin. GFR was measured by the plasma clearance of chromium 51-edathamil (51Cr-EDTA).
RESULTS: Carboplatin pharmacokinetics in children were best described in most patients (16 of 22) by a two-compartment model. The dose-normalized area under the plasma carboplatin concentration versus time curve (AUC) ranged from 3.1 to 9.6 mg/mL.min/400 mg/m2 and there was only a weak linear relationship between carboplatin dose and AUC (R2 = .31). There was a significant relationship between absolute carboplatin and 51Cr-EDTA clearances (R2 = .56), but the relationship was weaker (R2 = .28) when both clearances were normalized for body surface area. Carboplatin plasma clearance was predicted by the equation: clearance = GFR (mL/min) + 0.36 x body weight (BW; kg), and a modified form of the adult carboplatin dose formula is proposed: dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR [mL/min] + [0.36 x BW(kg)]). Two further equations were developed that use the 51Cr-EDTA half-life (t1/2) to calculate the GFR and these may reduce errors resulting from inaccurate measurement of the volume of distribution for 51Cr-EDTA. In patients treated with single-agent carboplatin or carboplatin plus vincristine, there was a significant sigmoidal relationship between AUC and thrombocytopenia (R2 = .56).
CONCLUSION: GFR-based carboplatin dosing in children should be feasible and will be evaluated prospectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8246021     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.12.2314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

1.  High-dose carboplatin, thiotepa, and etoposide with autologous stem cell rescue for patients with previously irradiated recurrent medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Ira J Dunkel; Sharon L Gardner; James H Garvin; Stewart Goldman; Weiji Shi; Jonathan L Finlay
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Analysis of thrombocytopenia due to carboplatin combined with etoposide in elderly patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  K Shibata; Y Nakatsumi; K Kasahara; T Bando; M Fujimura; T Matsuda
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and dose optimisation of carboplatin.

Authors:  S B Duffull; B A Robinson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Dose adjustment of carboplatin in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Achuta K Guddati; Parijat S Joy; Creticus P Marak
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Phase I trials in paediatric oncology--the European perspective. The New Agents Group of the United Kingdom Childrens Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  E J Estlin; S Ablett; D R Newell; I J Lewis; L Lashford; A D Pearson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Comparison of two methods for carboplatin dosing in children with retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Steven Allen; Matthew W Wilson; Amy Watkins; Catherine Billups; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Barrett H Haik; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Population pharmacokinetics of carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan in children: a re-evaluation of paediatric dosing formulas for carboplatin in patients with normal or mild impairment of renal function.

Authors:  J K Duong; G J Veal; C E Nath; P J Shaw; J Errington; R Ladenstein; A V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  The use of the Calvert formula to determine the optimal carboplatin dosage.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; S Rodenhuis; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  The war on cancer: have we won the battle but lost the war?

Authors:  Rachel Brennan; Sara Federico; Michael A Dyer
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2010-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.