PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin in children and use the data to develop a pediatric dose formula. It was anticipated that renal function would be a major determinant of carboplatin disposition and the relationship between carboplatin clearance and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was examined in detail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma carboplatin pharmacokinetics were measured as ultrafiltrable platinum in 22 patients (5 to 63 kg) following 200 to 1,000 mg/m2 of carboplatin. GFR was measured by the plasma clearance of chromium 51-edathamil (51Cr-EDTA). RESULTS: Carboplatin pharmacokinetics in children were best described in most patients (16 of 22) by a two-compartment model. The dose-normalized area under the plasma carboplatin concentration versus time curve (AUC) ranged from 3.1 to 9.6 mg/mL.min/400 mg/m2 and there was only a weak linear relationship between carboplatin dose and AUC (R2 = .31). There was a significant relationship between absolute carboplatin and 51Cr-EDTA clearances (R2 = .56), but the relationship was weaker (R2 = .28) when both clearances were normalized for body surface area. Carboplatin plasma clearance was predicted by the equation: clearance = GFR (mL/min) + 0.36 x body weight (BW; kg), and a modified form of the adult carboplatin dose formula is proposed: dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR [mL/min] + [0.36 x BW(kg)]). Two further equations were developed that use the 51Cr-EDTA half-life (t1/2) to calculate the GFR and these may reduce errors resulting from inaccurate measurement of the volume of distribution for 51Cr-EDTA. In patients treated with single-agent carboplatin or carboplatin plus vincristine, there was a significant sigmoidal relationship between AUC and thrombocytopenia (R2 = .56). CONCLUSION: GFR-based carboplatin dosing in children should be feasible and will be evaluated prospectively.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin in children and use the data to develop a pediatric dose formula. It was anticipated that renal function would be a major determinant of carboplatin disposition and the relationship between carboplatin clearance and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was examined in detail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma carboplatin pharmacokinetics were measured as ultrafiltrable platinum in 22 patients (5 to 63 kg) following 200 to 1,000 mg/m2 of carboplatin. GFR was measured by the plasma clearance of chromium 51-edathamil (51Cr-EDTA). RESULTS:Carboplatin pharmacokinetics in children were best described in most patients (16 of 22) by a two-compartment model. The dose-normalized area under the plasma carboplatin concentration versus time curve (AUC) ranged from 3.1 to 9.6 mg/mL.min/400 mg/m2 and there was only a weak linear relationship between carboplatin dose and AUC (R2 = .31). There was a significant relationship between absolute carboplatin and 51Cr-EDTA clearances (R2 = .56), but the relationship was weaker (R2 = .28) when both clearances were normalized for body surface area. Carboplatin plasma clearance was predicted by the equation: clearance = GFR (mL/min) + 0.36 x body weight (BW; kg), and a modified form of the adult carboplatin dose formula is proposed: dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR [mL/min] + [0.36 x BW(kg)]). Two further equations were developed that use the 51Cr-EDTA half-life (t1/2) to calculate the GFR and these may reduce errors resulting from inaccurate measurement of the volume of distribution for 51Cr-EDTA. In patients treated with single-agent carboplatin or carboplatin plus vincristine, there was a significant sigmoidal relationship between AUC and thrombocytopenia (R2 = .56). CONCLUSION: GFR-based carboplatin dosing in children should be feasible and will be evaluated prospectively.
Authors: Ira J Dunkel; Sharon L Gardner; James H Garvin; Stewart Goldman; Weiji Shi; Jonathan L Finlay Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2005 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Steven Allen; Matthew W Wilson; Amy Watkins; Catherine Billups; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Barrett H Haik; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: J K Duong; G J Veal; C E Nath; P J Shaw; J Errington; R Ladenstein; A V Boddy Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: L J van Warmerdam; S Rodenhuis; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 1995 Impact factor: 4.553