BACKGROUND: Carboplatin is the most effective drug in retinoblastoma but systemic clearance is variable in young patients. While most regimens use a flat dose, individualized targeting may provide a more adjusted systemic exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared carboplatin doses between two groups of children with retinoblastoma that were treated using a flat dose of 560 mg/m(2) or a targeted AUC of 6.5 using a modified Calvert formula. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients with retinoblastoma received a total of 576 cycles of carboplatin (median 8 cycles). Fifty patients (51%) received a fixed dose per m(2), 32 (33%) received a dose based on AUC, 1 patient received fixed dose per kilogram, and in 15 patients a combination AUC and fixed doses was used. The median cumulative carboplatin dose (mg/m(2)) for patients who received eight cycles using fixed per m(2) dosing was 2151.8 (range, 1414.2-2852.0), compared to 1104.1 for nine patients who received eight cycles using Calvert dosing (range, 779.0-1992.7) (P < 0.001). For cycles given using AUC, the median percentage of the hypothetical fixed per m(2) dose was 70% (range, 48-134%). Younger patients had larger differences. Patients receiving carboplatin based on fixed per m(2) dosing were 3.0 times more likely to have a platelet transfusion (95% confidence interval, 1.3-7.3). CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin administration needs to consider the changes in renal function occurring during the first months of life. The use of a targeted AUC provides the most accurate method; however, mg per kg of body weight dosing is a very reliable alternative method.
BACKGROUND:Carboplatin is the most effective drug in retinoblastoma but systemic clearance is variable in young patients. While most regimens use a flat dose, individualized targeting may provide a more adjusted systemic exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared carboplatin doses between two groups of children with retinoblastoma that were treated using a flat dose of 560 mg/m(2) or a targeted AUC of 6.5 using a modified Calvert formula. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients with retinoblastoma received a total of 576 cycles of carboplatin (median 8 cycles). Fifty patients (51%) received a fixed dose per m(2), 32 (33%) received a dose based on AUC, 1 patient received fixed dose per kilogram, and in 15 patients a combination AUC and fixed doses was used. The median cumulative carboplatin dose (mg/m(2)) for patients who received eight cycles using fixed per m(2) dosing was 2151.8 (range, 1414.2-2852.0), compared to 1104.1 for nine patients who received eight cycles using Calvert dosing (range, 779.0-1992.7) (P < 0.001). For cycles given using AUC, the median percentage of the hypothetical fixed per m(2) dose was 70% (range, 48-134%). Younger patients had larger differences. Patients receiving carboplatin based on fixed per m(2) dosing were 3.0 times more likely to have a platelet transfusion (95% confidence interval, 1.3-7.3). CONCLUSIONS:Carboplatin administration needs to consider the changes in renal function occurring during the first months of life. The use of a targeted AUC provides the most accurate method; however, mg per kg of body weight dosing is a very reliable alternative method.
Authors: J P Sculier; M Paesmans; J Thiriaux; J Lecomte; G Bureau; V Giner; G Koumakis; J J Lafitte; M C Berchier; C G Alexopoulos; C Zacharias; P Mommen; V Ninane; J Klastersky Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: H Thomas; A V Boddy; M W English; R Hobson; J Imeson; I Lewis; B Morland; A D Pearson; R Pinkerton; L Price; M Stevens; D R Newell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carol L Shields; Santosh G Honavar; Anna T Meadows; Jerry A Shields; Hakan Demirci; Arun Singh; Debra L Friedman; Thomas John Naduvilath Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: L J van Warmerdam; S Rodenhuis; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 1996 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew W Wilson; Barrett G Haik; Thomas E Merchant; Catherine A Billups; Nirali Shah; Alvida Cain; James Langston; Mindy Lipson; Larry E Kun; Charles B Pratt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Guillermo L Chantada; Barrett G Haik; Matthew W Wilson Journal: Curr Treat Options Neurol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Johnnie K Bass; Jianrong Wu; Catherine A Billups; Amy W Wozniak; Thomas E Merchant; Barrett G Haik; Matthew W Wilson; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J K Duong; G J Veal; C E Nath; P J Shaw; J Errington; R Ladenstein; A V Boddy Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Sonia Bianchini; Chiara Morini; Laura Nicoletti; Sara Monaco; Erika Rigotti; Caterina Caminiti; Giorgio Conti; Maia De Luca; Daniele Donà; Giuseppe Maglietta; Laura Lancella; Andrea Lo Vecchio; Giorgio Marchini; Carlo Pietrasanta; Nicola Principi; Alessandro Simonini; Elisabetta Venturini; Rosa Longo; Elena Gusson; Domenico Boccuzzi; Luca Vigo; Fabio Mosca; Annamaria Staiano; Susanna Esposito Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-04-22
Authors: Mirjam E van de Velde; Emil den Bakker; Hester N Blufpand; Gertjan L Kaspers; Floor C H Abbink; Arjenne W A Kors; Abraham J Wilhelm; Richard J Honeywell; Godefridus J Peters; Birgit Stoffel-Wagner; Laurien M Buffart; Arend Bökenkamp Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: A Laura Nijstad; Shelby Barnett; Arief Lalmohamed; Inez M Bérénos; Elizabeth Parke; Vickyanne Carruthers; Deborah A Tweddle; Jordon Kong; C Michel Zwaan; Alwin D R Huitema; Gareth J Veal Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: David H Abramson; Brian P Marr; Jasmine H Francis; Ira J Dunkel; Armida W M Fabius; Scott E Brodie; Ijah Mondesire-Crump; Y Pierre Gobin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240