Literature DB >> 8244331

Data on the CGG repeat at the fragile X site in the non-retarded Japanese population and family suggest the presence of a subgroup of normal alleles predisposing to mutate.

T Arinami1, M Asano, K Kobayashi, H Yanagi, H Hamaguchi.   

Abstract

The fragile X mutation is the result of amplification in the repeat number of p(CGG)n in FMR-1; alleles with more than 52 repeats have been shown to be so unstable as to mutate in the repeat number in almost every transmission. To improve our understanding of mutations in normal alleles of FMR-1, the following studies were carried out in the Japanese population: a study on length variation in the repeat to determine the allele distribution of the repeat length in a non-retarded population, family studies to observe new mutations in normal allele, and haplotype analyses with microsatellite markers flanking the repeat to confirm estimated mutation rates and founder chromosomes in the fragile X syndrome. Analysis of the p(CGG)n in 370 unrelated males detected 24 distinct alleles with repeats of 18-44. A comparison with previously reported data suggests the presence of racial/ethnic differences in the allele distribution. No premutation allele was found in 824 unrelated X chromosomes examined by the polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot analysis. Family studies detected one new mutation in a total of 303 meioses. However, the mutation rate was not in accordance with the expected or observed heterozygosities in the population or with linkage disequilibrium observed between the repeat numbers and the haplotypes of the markers flanking the CGG. The haplotype in the chromosome in which the new mutation was found was the same as that frequently found in the Japanese fragile X chromosomes, and the variance in the CGG repeat number was wider in chromosomes with the haplotypes frequently found in the fragile X chromosome than in those with the other haplotypes. These observations suggest that a subgroup is present in normal alleles and that this subgroup is more liable to mutate than others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8244331     DOI: 10.1007/bf00216445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  19 in total

1.  Frequent small amplifications in the FMR-1 gene in fra(X) families: limits to the diagnosis of 'premutations'.

Authors:  J N Macpherson; D L Nelson; P A Jacobs
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups.

Authors:  A Edwards; H A Hammond; L Jin; C T Caskey; R Chakraborty
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy families, using dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms.

Authors:  P R Clemens; R G Fenwick; J S Chamberlain; R A Gibbs; M de Andrade; R Chakraborty; C T Caskey
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Characterization and expression of a cDNA encoding the human androgen receptor.

Authors:  W D Tilley; M Marcelli; J D Wilson; M J McPhaul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis.

Authors:  S L Sherman; N E Morton; P A Jacobs; G Turner
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Three novel partial deletions of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  K Yamakawa; K Takada; H Yanagi; S Tsuchiya; K Kawai; S Nakagawa; G Kajiyama; H Hamaguchi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

Authors:  Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; S Richards; A J Verkerk; J J Holden; R G Fenwick; S T Warren
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Frequency of the fragile X syndrome in Japanese mentally retarded males.

Authors:  T Arinami; I Kondo; S Nakajima
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Evidence of founder chromosomes in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  R I Richards; K Holman; K Friend; E Kremer; D Hillen; A Staples; W T Brown; P Goonewardena; J Tarleton; C Schwartz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  14 in total

1.  FMR1 haplotype analyses among Indians: a weak founder effect and other findings.

Authors:  Deepti Sharma; Meena Gupta; B K Thelma
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  No association between FMR1 premutations and multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  Ichiro Yabe; Hiroyuki Soma; Asako Takei; Naoto Fujik; Hidenao Sasaki
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  FMR1 in global populations.

Authors:  C B Kunst; C Zerylnick; L Karickhoff; E Eichler; J Bullard; M Chalifoux; J J Holden; A Torroni; D L Nelson; S T Warren
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Positive fragile X microsatellite associations point to a common mechanism of dynamic mutation evolution.

Authors:  W T Brown; N Zhong; C Dobkin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Predisposition to the fragile X syndrome in Jews of Tunisian descent is due to the absence of AGG interruptions on a rare Mediterranean haplotype.

Authors:  T C Falik-Zaccai; E Shachak; M Yalon; Z Lis; Z Borochowitz; J N Macpherson; D L Nelson; E E Eichler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The high prevalence of fragile X premutation carrier females: is this frequency unique to the French Canadian population?

Authors:  S L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Unusual (CGG)n expansion and recombination in a family with fragile X and DiGeorge syndrome.

Authors:  J N Macpherson; G Curtis; J A Crolla; N Dennis; B Migeon; P K Grewal; M C Hirst; K E Davies; P A Jacobs
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 8.  FMR1 triplet arrays: paying the price for perfection.

Authors:  M C Hirst
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Expansion of the CGG repeat in fragile X in the FMR1 gene depends on the sex of the offspring.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; R Huggins; V Petrovic; H Slater
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Apparent regression of the CGG repeat in FMR1 to an allele of normal size.

Authors:  L Vits; K De Boulle; E Reyniers; I Handig; J K Darby; B Oostra; P J Willems
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.