Literature DB >> 7959688

Apparent regression of the CGG repeat in FMR1 to an allele of normal size.

L Vits1, K De Boulle, E Reyniers, I Handig, J K Darby, B Oostra, P J Willems.   

Abstract

The fragile X syndrome is the result of amplification of a CGG trinucleotide repeat in the FMR1 gene and anticipation in this disease is caused by an intergenerational expansion of this repeat. Although regression of a CGG repeat in the premutation range is not uncommon, regression from a full premutation (> 200 repeats) or premutation range (50-200 repeats) to a repeat of normal size (< 50 repeats) has not yet been documented. We present here a family in which the number of repeats apparently regressed from approximately 110 in the mother to 44 in her daughter. Although the CGG repeat of the daughter is in the normal range, she is a carrier of the fragile X mutation based upon the segregation pattern of Xq27 markers flanking FMR1. It is unclear, however, whether this allele of 44 repeats will be stably transmitted, as the daughter has as yet no progeny. Nevertheless, the size range between normal alleles and premutation alleles overlap, a factor that complicates genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7959688     DOI: 10.1007/BF00211019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  25 in total

1.  X chromosome imprinting in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  W D Yu; S L Wenger; M W Steele
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Mitotic stability of fragile X mutations in differentiated cells indicates early post-conceptional trinucleotide repeat expansion.

Authors:  D Wöhrle; I Hennig; W Vogel; P Steinbach
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Frequency and stability of the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  A L Reiss; H H Kazazian; C M Krebs; A McAughan; C D Boehm; M T Abrams; D L Nelson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. National Fragile X Foundation.

Authors:  B A Oostra; P B Jacky; W T Brown; F Rousseau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Heritable unstable DNA sequences and hypermethylation associated with fragile X syndrome in Japanese families.

Authors:  T Hori; M Yamauchi; N Seki; S Tsuji; I Kondo
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Affected sibs with fragile X syndrome exhibit an age-dependent decrease in the size of the fragile X full mutation.

Authors:  E Mornet; M Jokic; A Bogyo; I Tejada; C Deluchat; J Boué; A Boué
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

Authors:  Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; S Richards; A J Verkerk; J J Holden; R G Fenwick; S T Warren
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Two brothers with mental retardation discordant for the fragile-X syndrome.

Authors:  B C Van Roy; P J Willems; L J Vits; B P Ceulemans; P J Coucke; B J Van der Auwera; J A Lormans; J E Dumon
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-05

9.  The full mutation in the FMR-1 gene of male fragile X patients is absent in their sperm.

Authors:  E Reyniers; L Vits; K De Boulle; B Van Roy; D Van Velzen; E de Graaff; A J Verkerk; H Z Jorens; J K Darby; B Oostra
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Segregation of the fragile X mutation from an affected male to his normal daughter.

Authors:  P J Willems; B Van Roy; K De Boulle; L Vits; E Reyniers; O Beck; J E Dumon; A Verkerk; B Oostra
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  13 in total

1.  Longitudinal interviews of couples diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing fragile X premutation testing.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Logan B Karns; Karen Ventura; Myra L Clark; Richard H Steeves; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Decrease in the CGGn trinucleotide repeat mutation of the fragile X syndrome to normal size range during paternal transmission.

Authors:  M L Väisänen; R Haataja; J Leisti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic counseling for fragile x syndrome: updated recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Brenda Finucane; Amy Cronister; Liane Abrams; Robin L Bennett; Barbara J Pettersen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic Counseling for Fragile X Syndrome: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  N McIntosh; L W Gane; A McConkie-Rosell; R L Bennett
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Mechanisms of DNA expansion.

Authors:  C T McMurray
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  FMR1 triplet arrays: paying the price for perfection.

Authors:  M C Hirst
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Deletion of all CGG repeats plus flanking sequences in FMR1 does not abolish gene expression.

Authors:  K Grønskov; H Hjalgrim; M O Bjerager; K Brøndum-Nielsen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome: loss of mutation owing to a double recombinant or gene conversion event at the FMR1 locus.

Authors:  M Losekoot; E Hoogendoorn; R Olmer; C C Jansen; J C Oosterwijk; A M van den Ouweland; D J Halley; S T Warren; R Willemsen; B A Oostra; E Bakker
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Recurrent and unexpected segregation of the FMR1 CGG repeat in a family with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  E Mornet; C Chateau; A Taillandier; B Simon-Bouy; J L Serre
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Emotional reaction to fragile X premutation carrier tests among infertile women.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Wendy L Morris; Logan B Karns
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.