Literature DB >> 8241915

The policy context.

R Robinson1.   

Abstract

The final article in the series considers the ways in which the methods described previously are used in the formation of policy. When health authorities are making decisions about how to spend their money they have to draw on several sources of information about priorities: diktats from policy makers, opinions of consumers and of the professional bodies involved, and evidence gained from research. They must also consider the various methods of costing and select the right one for their circumstances. Some of these methods are still in the early stages of development, but more are being developed all the time and they have a valuable role in helping decision making throughout the NHS.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8241915      PMCID: PMC1679163          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  6 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness guidelines for reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: is economic evaluation ready for its enhanced status?

Authors:  M Drummond
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Health economics and economists in the NHS.

Authors:  R Robinson; B New
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-28

3.  Contemporary theme. Rationing: at the cutting edge.

Authors:  M Cochrane; C Ham; C Heginbotham; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-26

4.  Some guidelines on the use of cost effectiveness league tables.

Authors:  J Mason; M Drummond; G Torrance
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-27

Review 5.  QALY league tables: handle with care.

Authors:  K Gerard; G Mooney
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.

Authors:  C Ham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-14
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Marginal analysis in practice: an alternative to needs assessment for contracting health care.

Authors:  D Cohen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24

2.  The problem with health measurement.

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Jeremy C Hobart
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Test-retest reliability of the EQ-5D-5L and the reworded QOLIBRI-OS in the general population of Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Di Long; Suzanne Polinder; Gouke J Bonsel; Juanita A Haagsma
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.