Literature DB >> 7950568

Marginal analysis in practice: an alternative to needs assessment for contracting health care.

D Cohen1.   

Abstract

Prioritising health care services on the basis of total needs can lead to inefficient use of resources. A better option is to determine priorities by marginal analysis, which examines the effects of altering the existing balance of expenditure between health care programmes. Resources to support investment are released from disinvestments-that is, the strategy is resource neutral. Thus an increase in total health benefits is achieved independent of any gains that may result from increased spending on health. In 1989 the Welsh Health Planning Forum identified 10 health gain areas, outlining within each one where further investment was likely to produce health gains and where disinvestment might be considered. All Welsh districts then attempted, with varying degrees of success, to produce a resource neutral strategy. Mid Glamorgan further explored the possibility of using marginal analysis in producing its strategy and influencing its policy for contracting. Working groups for most health gain areas each proposed 10 programmes for investment and a further 10 for disinvestment, which were then evaluated by a core evaluation team. In the case of maternal and child health the team dropped 10 of the 20 proposals. The remainder were considered by the health authority, which dropped a further proposal. Nine of the original 20 proposals thus formally became policy for 1995.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7950568      PMCID: PMC2541009          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6957.781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  2 in total

1.  Needs assessment: developing an economic approach.

Authors:  C Donaldson; S Farrar
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The policy context.

Authors:  R Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-16
  2 in total
  14 in total

1.  Resource allocation within Australian indigenous communities: a program for implementing vertical equity.

Authors:  V Wiseman; S Jan
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Priority setting in a Canadian surgical department: a case study using program budgeting and marginal analysis.

Authors:  Craig Mitton; Cam Donaldson; Barb Shellian; Cort Pagenkopf
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Using pharmacoeconomics to assess the comparative value of antibacterials. A UK perspective.

Authors:  P Davey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Economics, QALYs and medical ethics: a practical agenda?

Authors:  R Robinson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1995-08

Review 5.  Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: bridging the divide between doctors and managers.

Authors:  Danny Ruta; Craig Mitton; Angela Bate; Cam Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

6.  Health needs assessment is not required for priority setting.

Authors:  S Petrou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-24

7.  Health economics and clinical pathology.

Authors:  P Harnden
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Approaches to rationing drugs in hospitals. An Australian perspective.

Authors:  F Bochner; N G Burgess; E D Martin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Rationing. Medical profession should develop consensus on health priorities via debates.

Authors:  I J Robbé
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-22

10.  Marginal analysis in practice.

Authors:  A Mordue; N Craig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.