Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Cost-benefit analysis of hip fracture treatment.

Literature DB >> 1544965

Cost-benefit analysis of hip fracture treatment.

M J Parker¹, J W Myles, J K Anand, R Drewett.

Abstract

We have determined the quality-adjusted-life-years and cost of such in several types of hip fracture and various treatment options. Operative treatment proved more cost-effective than other methods for displaced subcapital fractures and for extracapsular fractures. For undisplaced subcapital fractures conservative treatment was almost as cost-effective as surgery.

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Year: 1992 PMID： 1544965

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br ISSN： 0301-620X

Keyword Cloud
Cited

13 in total

1. Prophylactic Fixation Can Be Cost-effective in Preventing a Contralateral Bisphosphonate-associated Femur Fracture.

Authors: Sam Y Jiang; David J Kaufman; Bonnie Y Chien; Michael Longoria; Ross Shachter; Julius A Bishop
Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2. [Procedural organisation: surgical and anaesthesiological management in hip fractures].

Authors: Ernst J Müller; Ingeborg Gerstorfer; Peter Dovjak; Bernhard Iglseder; Georg Pinter; Walter Müller; Katharina Pils; Peter Mikosch; Michaela Zmaritz; Monique Weissenberger-Leduc; Markus Gosch; Heinrich W Thaler
Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2013-11-08

3. A comparison of two fixation methods for femoral trochanteric fractures: a new generation intramedullary system vs sliding hip screw.

Authors: Christian Carulli; Federico Piacentini; Tommaso Paoli; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal: Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab Date: 2017-05-30

Review 4. Hip fracture prevention: cost-effective strategies.

Authors: P Vestergaard; L Rejnmark; L Mosekilde
Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.981

5. Undisplaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly.

Authors: F Y Chiu; W H Lo
Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 1996 Impact factor: 3.067

6. Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors: G M Waaler Bjørnelv; F Frihagen; J E Madsen; L Nordsletten; E Aas
Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 4.507

Cost-benefit analysis of hip fracture treatment.

1. Prophylactic Fixation Can Be Cost-effective in Preventing a Contralateral Bisphosphonate-associated Femur Fracture.

Review 2. [Procedural organisation: surgical and anaesthesiological management in hip fractures].

3. A comparison of two fixation methods for femoral trochanteric fractures: a new generation intramedullary system vs sliding hip screw.

Review 4. Hip fracture prevention: cost-effective strategies.

5. Undisplaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly.

6. Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial.

7. Cost analysis of early discharge after hip fracture.

8. Hip fractures in the elderly: operative versus nonoperative management.

9. Cost analysis of a system of ad hoc theatre sessions for the management of delayed trauma cases.

10. Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment.