Literature DB >> 8236850

Orientation, masking, and vernier acuity for line targets.

S J Waugh1, D M Levi, T Carney.   

Abstract

In an attempt to uncover the properties of the psychophysical spatial mechanisms which optimally respond to the vernier offset between two abutting lines, we investigated the effects of one-dimensional band-limited spatial noise masks superimposed with the target, on vernier thresholds. Unidirectional vernier thresholds were measured in the presence of masks varying in orientation, spatial frequency content and luminance modulation. Because of the dependence of vernier thresholds on target visibility, the effects of these masks on target detection thresholds were also measured. In accordance with the results of Findlay [(1973) Nature, 241, 135-137] but contrary to an hypothesis that the direction of the vernier offset is mediated by the differential output of spatial filters of a single orientation, our results reveal a bimodal orientation tuning function for vernier acuity. We propose that, for offset line targets, the differential responses of at least two filters with orientations which straddle the target lines are combined to extract relative position information. The spatial frequency tuning characteristics of the optimal mechanisms for mediating vernier information are similar to those optimal for detecting the target lines themselves, except that they are tuned to a slightly higher spatial frequency and have a slightly narrower bandwidth. The spatial mechanisms most sensitive to the vernier offset and to target detection exhibit similar responses to increases in mask modulation. This finding suggests that these tasks are limited by the same source of noise, and explains why under a variety of experimental manipulations, equally visible vernier targets result in similar vernier thresholds.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8236850     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90028-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Luminance and chromatic contributions to a hyperacuity task: isolation by contrast polarity and target separation.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Bonnie Cooper; Barry B Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Age-related changes in visually evoked electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Gijs Plomp; Marina Kunchulia; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Characterizing perceptual performance at multiple discrimination precisions in external noise.

Authors:  Seong-Taek Jeon; Zhong-Lin Lu; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Attention selects informative neural populations in human V1.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Yee-Joon Kim; Alex R Wade
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; J Stephen Mansfield
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Relationship between threshold and suprathreshold perception of position and stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Dorcas K Tsang; Michael T Ukwade
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Configurational asymmetry in vernier offset detection.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-10-06

8.  Cortical sources of Vernier acuity in the human visual system: An EEG-source imaging study.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Yee-Joon Kim; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Motion adaptation improves acuity (but perceived size doesn't matter).

Authors:  Selassie Tagoh; Lisa M Hamm; Dietrich S Schwarzkopf; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

10.  The equivalent internal orientation and position noise for contour integration.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Minnie Fu; Reza Farivar; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.