Literature DB >> 8235849

Static and cyclical biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw spinal constructs.

B W Cunningham1, J C Sefter, Y Shono, P C McAfee.   

Abstract

Biomechanical evaluation of twelve different spinal devices in vitro employing pedicle screws was performed using static (n = 5) and cyclical testing (n = 3) parameters. In general, the rank order of implant failures was similar between static and cyclical tests, performed at 600 N compressive load, 5 Hz, and 1 million cycles. The mean number of cycles to failure was higher for spinal instrumentation systems employing longitudinal rods than those using plates (ANOVA F = 16.94, P < .001). At 600 N, the compact Cotrel-Dubousset, TSRH, and ISOLA rod systems demonstrated mean cycles to failure ranging from 200,000 to 800,000 cycles. The remaining devices including Dyna-lok, Kirschner plate, and VSP devices had failures ranging from 50,000 to 210,000 cycles. Polyethylene cylinders representing vertebral bodies were used to eliminate the problems of biologic deterioration encountered with cadaveric spines (a full cyclical test to 1 million cycles required 56 hours), and thus to provide analysis of the weak portion of each spinal system. The failure of eleven of the twelve spinal systems occurred by fracture of a pedicle screw, most commonly at the junction of the upper screw thread and the collar (Kirschner, AO fixator, standard CD, ISOLA, and TSRH). However, in Dynalok and VSP systems, fracture of the threaded portion of the screw just posterior to the integral nuts was the most common screw fracture location. The compact CD system was the only spinal implant that consistently failed by fracture of the longitudinal spinal member (rod). The fatigue life of rod based systems was longer than plate based systems. These studies confirm the importance of anterior column load sharing (vertebral body, corpectomy bone graft) as the mean bending strength demonstrated by these implant systems was not inordinately high using this "worst case scenario" model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8235849     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  The mechanical role of laminar hook protection of pedicle screws at the caudal end vertebra.

Authors:  J Y Margulies; R S Casar; S A Caruso; M G Neuwirth; T R Haher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Lie-Hua Liu; Cong-Tao Guo; Qiang Zhou; Xiao-Bing Pu; Lei Song; Hao-Ming Wang; Chen Zhao; Shi-Ming Cheng; Yang-Jun Lan; Ling Liu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

3.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can we compare in vitro and in vivo loads on the instrumentation?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Li-Xin Guo; Dan Zhao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Revision pedicle screws with impaction bone grafting: a case series.

Authors:  Matthew Alexander Lea; Mahmoud Elmalky; Silviu Sabou; Irfan Siddique; Rajat Verma; Saeed Mohammad
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

7.  Mechanical Performance of Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Growing Rod Implants: Experimental and Computational Study.

Authors:  Mary H Foltz; Andrew L Freeman; Galyna Loughran; Joan E Bechtold; Victor H Barocas; Arin M Ellingson; David W Polly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Antonio E Castellvi; Hao Huang; Tov Vestgaarden; Sunil Saigal; Deborah H Clabeaux; David Pienkowski
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-05-01

9.  Early results from posterior cervical fusion with a screw-rod system.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Kim; Dong Ah Shin; Seung Yi; Do Heum Yoon; Keung Nyun Kim; Hyun Chul Shin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Ruey Mo Lin; Hsiang-Ho Chen; Kai-Jow Tsai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.